28.06.2023 Views

Nor'West News: June 29, 2023

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8<br />

Thursday <strong>June</strong> <strong>29</strong> <strong>2023</strong><br />

The public feud between two of<br />

SAINT: Nurse<br />

Sibylla Maude<br />

started what<br />

would become<br />

New Zealand’s<br />

district nurse<br />

programme.<br />

TWO OF the city’s favourite<br />

daughters once went head to<br />

head in a public scrap that was<br />

rather unbecoming of their<br />

status as ‘saints in the making’.<br />

The redoubtable nurse Sibylla<br />

Emily Maude – originator<br />

of what would become New<br />

Zealand’s district nurse<br />

programme and this country’s<br />

answer to Florence Nightingale<br />

– took on women’s suffragist<br />

and mother of the nation,<br />

Kate Sheppard, in a public<br />

disagreement which resonated<br />

in the letters to the editor pages<br />

of the Christchurch Star and the<br />

Lyttelton Times over the last few<br />

days of 1898.<br />

The interaction features in<br />

Judith Devaliant’s book Kate<br />

Sheppard: A Biography.<br />

“The issue concerned an<br />

anonymous woman who<br />

had had the misfortune of<br />

contracting what was clearly<br />

a rather nasty disease,” says<br />

Helen Osborne, property lead<br />

for Te Whare Waiutuutu Kate<br />

Sheppard House.<br />

Kate Sheppard’s Ilam home is<br />

today cared for by Heritage New<br />

Zealand Pouhere Taonga.<br />

“Suffragist Kate Sheppard<br />

and fellow women’s advocate<br />

Ada Wells wrote a letter to the<br />

editor highlighting the plight of<br />

the woman and her family and<br />

describing her condition as ‘a<br />

disease of loathsome form, the<br />

details of which are so revolting<br />

they cannot be here explained’.<br />

The zealous duo petitioned<br />

for the removal of the two sons<br />

of the woman in question so<br />

they could be lodged elsewhere<br />

in healthier surroundings as<br />

the boys were unable to isolate<br />

themselves within the rather<br />

pokey confines of their cottage.<br />

They argued the sons were in<br />

danger of becoming “a fruitful<br />

source of contamination to<br />

those with whom they come in<br />

contact”.<br />

Because the mother’s<br />

condition was a chronic one,<br />

the Charitable Aid Board had<br />

advised it had done all it could<br />

reasonably do. Both Sheppard<br />

and Wells asked people to send<br />

money to the newspaper to<br />

help out if they possibly could,<br />

adding “much could be said of<br />

the pitiful life of the children<br />

brought into hourly contact<br />

with hideous disease, but we<br />

refrain”.<br />

“From 1885 all hospitals<br />

were run by Charitable Aid<br />

Boards whose role was partly<br />

to assess patients to determine<br />

whether they could pay for their<br />

treatment. People assessed as<br />

‘paupers’ were treated for free,”<br />

says Osborne.<br />

“Boards and some members<br />

of the public were quick to<br />

expose people they believed<br />

were ripping off the system. The<br />

way patients were perceived by<br />

the Charitable Aid Boards was<br />

very important. Sensitivities<br />

about communicable diseases,<br />

including venereal disease,<br />

made public health and fair<br />

access to treatment a hot<br />

issue that left many women<br />

particularly vulnerable.”<br />

The Lyttelton Times started to<br />

receive donations as a result of<br />

the letter, and before long, it also<br />

received another contribution<br />

from a reader – a letter from<br />

Maude, who had a few things to<br />

say about the original Sheppard/<br />

Wells letter. And when Maude<br />

said something, people had a<br />

tendency to sit up and listen.<br />

A word from Ilam MP<br />

Sarah<br />

Pallett<br />

Having a warm home is an essential<br />

part of preventing respiratory<br />

illnesses through the winter season<br />

and lowers the risk of other health<br />

issues. But the cost can be a real<br />

barrier.<br />

That’s why we’re continuing to<br />

support over a million Kiwis with the<br />

Winter Energy Payment. I’ve heard<br />

from many constituents what a relief<br />

it is to not have to worry so much<br />

about turning the heating off to save<br />

on power bills.<br />

When I worked as a midwife, I saw<br />

first-hand what it means to be unable<br />

to heat your home. To have to choose<br />

between getting a prescription filled<br />

or buying a few loaves of bread.<br />

Therefore, when Finance Minister<br />

Grant Robertson came before caucus<br />

and told us that we were going to be<br />

scrapping the $5 prescription fee, I<br />

felt quite emotional because I know<br />

what a massive difference this is<br />

going to make to the health of our<br />

people.<br />

We know that more than 135,000<br />

adults did not collect their<br />

medications because of cost in<br />

2021-22. But when people are able<br />

to pick up all of the medication<br />

that their doctor has prescribed for<br />

them, it reduces the chance of small<br />

issues becoming big problems that<br />

require hospitalisation. This eases the<br />

pressure on our health system, which<br />

benefits everyone.<br />

I know that these actions, alongside<br />

our recent 1 April income boosts,<br />

will help many families make ends<br />

meet and stay healthy over the winter<br />

months.<br />

As always, I’m here to help. Please get<br />

in touch on 0800 727 224 or pop into<br />

the office if you need any assistance.<br />

Funded by Parliamentary Service. Authorised by Sarah Pallett MP, Parliament Buildings, Wellington.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!