04.10.2023 Views

The Star: October 05, 2023

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Star</strong> Thursday <strong>October</strong> 5 <strong>2023</strong><br />

10<br />

NEWS<br />

Latest Canterbury news at starnews.co.nz<br />

Judge rules disciplinary action can be<br />

taken against Reay over CTV disaster<br />

• By Soumya Bhamidipati<br />

THE professional engineering<br />

body can take disciplinary<br />

action against the man<br />

whose company designed the<br />

Canterbury Television building,<br />

a judge has ruled.<br />

<strong>The</strong> six-storey CTV building<br />

collapsed during the February<br />

22, 2011, earthquake, killing 115<br />

people.<br />

Engineering New Zealand<br />

(ENZ – formerly known as the Institution<br />

of Professional Engineers<br />

New Zealand, or IPENZ) wants to<br />

investigate whether Dr Alan Reay<br />

should have better supervised<br />

his employee who designed the<br />

building.<br />

However, Reay is calling for<br />

the disciplinary action to be<br />

abandoned because of how much<br />

time has passed.<br />

It follows years of litigation,<br />

including judicial decisions on<br />

whether a disciplinary committee<br />

had the jurisdiction to<br />

investigate someone who was no<br />

longer a member of the professional<br />

body.<br />

Now, Justice Paul Radich has<br />

ruled in ENZ’s favour.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> disciplinary process is<br />

able to, and should, see itself<br />

through,” he said, noting the<br />

court would not normally intervene<br />

before a complaint process<br />

was completed.<br />

“I am satisfied that in this case<br />

it continues to be in the public<br />

interest to enable the disciplinary<br />

committee to consider the complaints<br />

substantively.”<br />

At a hearing at the High<br />

Court at Wellington last month,<br />

Reay’s lawyer, Kristy McDonald,<br />

Alan Reay<br />

TRAGEDY:<br />

<strong>The</strong> six-storey<br />

CTV building<br />

collapsed<br />

during the<br />

February<br />

22, 2011<br />

earthquake,<br />

killing 115<br />

people.<br />

PHOTO:<br />

GEOFF SLOAN<br />

argued there was no explicit<br />

requirement under the 1986<br />

rules – when the building was<br />

constructed – for her client to<br />

supervise his employee.<br />

She argued the agency had not<br />

specified which rule her client<br />

was meant to have broken, and<br />

had drawn the matter out over<br />

more than a decade.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no need to protect<br />

the public, McDonald said, as<br />

Reay was now 82 and had retired<br />

from engineering.<br />

Justice Radich said while the<br />

1986 code did not refer explicitly<br />

to supervision, it was implied in<br />

how the provisions were worded.<br />

“A member operating a<br />

business that employs other<br />

engineers will, if they are to act<br />

professionally and with integrity,<br />

and if they are to recognise their<br />

responsibilities in the public<br />

interest and to their profession,<br />

supervise those employees,” he<br />

said.<br />

“Accordingly, it is for the disciplinary<br />

committee to determine,<br />

based upon evidence of the<br />

nature of Dr Reay’s practice in<br />

1986, whether his peers would<br />

regard that conduct as being<br />

in line with generally accepted<br />

standards of the profession at the<br />

time.”<br />

While he acknowledged the<br />

time that had elapsed, Justice<br />

Radich found the delays should<br />

not prevent the disciplinary<br />

hearing from proceeding, and<br />

would not unfairly impact Reay.<br />

ENZ chief executive Dr Richard<br />

Templer said he was encouraged<br />

by the court’s decision.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> reality is it’s been 12<br />

years since the Christchurch<br />

earthquake, whereby 115 people<br />

tragically lost their lives when<br />

the CTV building collapsed.<br />

“People are looking for answers<br />

and this decision confirms<br />

this complaint must be allowed<br />

to continue through the normal<br />

process and be heard by a disciplinary<br />

committee from the<br />

profession.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> disciplinary process would<br />

begin as quickly as possible,<br />

Templer said.<br />

A 2012 Royal Commission of<br />

Inquiry found Reay’s employee,<br />

engineer David Harding, made<br />

fundamental errors in designing<br />

the building.<br />

It criticised Reay for handing<br />

sole responsibility for the design<br />

over to somebody so inexperienced.<br />

That same year, 54 family<br />

members and the Ministry of<br />

Building, Innovation and Employment’s<br />

chief engineer made<br />

complaints about both men to<br />

the professional body.<br />

A separate police<br />

investigation, which concluded<br />

in November 2017, resulted in<br />

no criminal prosecution for the<br />

building’s collapse.<br />

– RNZ<br />

Kōrero mai, let’s talk about our<br />

Safer speed plan<br />

Way safer for everyone<br />

We’re planning to make more speed limit<br />

changes in some areas across Christchurch.<br />

Lower speeds can save lives and prevent serious injury.<br />

Reducing our speed makes a major difference in a crash.<br />

People make mistakes on our roads, and those mistakes<br />

shouldn’t cost our neighbours, whānau or pets their lives.<br />

Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency have changed the way<br />

speed limits are set. This gives us an opportunity to plan an<br />

area-wide approach for speed changes.<br />

We’re asking for feedback on our 10-year vision and<br />

principles for safe speeds across Christchurch and Banks<br />

Peninsula, as well as our first three years of implementation.<br />

To read the plan and give feedback by<br />

25 <strong>October</strong>, visit<br />

letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/saferspeedsplan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!