Paekche's Principle - The Great Secret Of Asia

through total suppression of the victims from historical memory; appropriation of all their
native cultures by the simple use of forgeries (sinization of major intellectual works,
names of scholars, scientific knowledge, spirituality, etc.) and chrono-historical
arrangement of the reality by anti-dating and post-dating of historical documentation
related to “barbarian” peoples, etc.
Their populations being genocided, all the Asian kingdoms of a millennial African culture
as well as their highly technical and spiritual civilization, by these make-up and false
entry, were labelled “Chinese”, “Vietnamese”, “Thai”, “Cambodian”, “Indian”, etc. and
imbedded as such into the official history of China and the respective countries. China,
just like others, can then claim a “Chinese” and “very ancient” civilization while being
unable to provide any scientific basis for it, while prohibiting free scientific research on
the “Chinese” antiquity period.
An astonishing historiographic stability
Paekche’s principle introduces the revealing force of African science into a
historiography of Asia where legends and insubstantial statements serve as irrefutable
proofs.
The answer to the question why only a few Japanese historians questioned the
strangeness of some historical data is to be located in at least three directions.
1* A peculiarity of cultures in today’s Asia is that, for perfect mind and social control of
individuals, the importance of interpersonal relationships is somewhat higher than
elsewhere in the world. It is the channel of communication to handover at least 90% of
all culture under symbolic non-verbal forms of information, and 99% of critical information to
transcend the essence of national culture and the profound nature of local paradigms.
This relativizes, for foreigners, the emphasis on learning Asian languages and cultures,
even at university level, where the essential information content is very low, or at zero
level in the case of the Koreas. One of the purposes for such cultural programs under
government patronage is essentially to create, with the country and culture concerned,
emotional and interpersonal bonds capable of distorting the critical judgment of the
foreigner in the last resort.
2* I would evaluate the volume of research articles centered on the antiquity (up to the 8
th century) to 1% of the total devoted to the history of the Northeast region, against more
than 75% for the contemporary period (from 1945 to this day). This rate could be even
lower than 1% for the rest of Asia.
20