26.02.2024 Views

Lot's Wife Edition 8 2013

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NATIONAL AFFAIRS<br />

CONSEQUENCES IN<br />

ZONE 2<br />

Linking east and west, dividing inner and outer Melbourne<br />

Anthony Taylor<br />

The proposal for a freeway from Clifton Hill to Parkville (and then to<br />

the Western Ring Road) may not seem immediately relevant to transport<br />

in Clayton. However, the size of the project means it has significance<br />

for all of Melbourne, even all of Australia. This<br />

is because approximately $8 billion would be tied<br />

to the project. The sheer amount of Victorian<br />

Government funding needed will preclude the<br />

implementation of other policies and infrastructure<br />

projects across the state.<br />

The commentary and developments regarding<br />

the East West Link proposal affirm, amongst many<br />

other things, a key lesson about transport policy in<br />

Victoria. The lesson is that there is an inner suburbouter<br />

suburb divide in Melbourne, which extends<br />

to community response to transport policy; and<br />

complementing this, there is a public transportprivate<br />

(ie. motor) transport divide. There is certainly a complex and<br />

fascinating relationship between these two binaries which is played out in<br />

the media and is also evidenced by actors: politicians, transport bureaucrats,<br />

the road lobby, inner-city activists and so on.<br />

“Where inner Melbourne<br />

expanded with the provision<br />

of good public transport, and<br />

then cars augmented this<br />

later, in Zone 2 it has only<br />

ever been cars. In Zone 2,<br />

then, a new freeway further<br />

entrenches how necessary a<br />

car is to get around.”<br />

It is difficult to intelligently explain why there is such a divide in<br />

community response (or lack thereof) to transport projects. The answer<br />

which is often parroted would be that it is simply “hipsters” or “inner city<br />

lefties” who protest road projects; meanwhile, the<br />

“battlers” in the outer suburbs don’t have time for<br />

such bullshit. They have long hours and bills to pay,<br />

and cars are the only practical way of getting around.<br />

Sadly, the next move of the Hun-style argument is<br />

to convince people in outer suburbs that, since it is<br />

only the privileged city dweller who protests roads,<br />

the best they can and should expect is a new road.<br />

However, the overwhelming investment in private<br />

motor transport, and concomitant urban sprawl over<br />

the past 50 years can also do some work to explain<br />

the differing responses to road projects in inner and<br />

outer Melbourne.<br />

Every time a new freeway is built in this city, it sharpens the divide<br />

between the way transport works in Zone 1 and Zone 2. The impact of a<br />

new freeway, regardless of where it is built (leaving aside local impacts), is<br />

not so dramatic for those living in Zone 1. There remains a choice between<br />

10 LOT’S WIFE EDITION 8 • <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!