Fla. Stat, (1981) - Florida State University College of Law

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STA" v. STATE 2d761(.Fla. 3rd DX, STATE v. CLAY 268.W. TIma 1935) STAT% v. REJB 3410. 2d 348 (La. 1977) STEINHORST v. STAm 412 So. 2d 332- 1982) smmv. smm 397 So. 2d 903 (Fla, 1981) 1977) STRIPLINGv. S'IIATE: 349 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1977) TKfWRv. STATE 294 So. 2d=(Fla. 1974) !lEDDERv. STATE 322 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1975) TELFAIRv. STaTE 56 Fla. 104,470. 863 (1908) T H W v. STATE 202 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1967) TORRENCE: v. STATE 430 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1983) TRAINERV. smm 346 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1977) u. s. v. AGm 427 U.S. 971976) u. s. v. €€ALE 422 US. 171 (-1975) VAN (aT.J.m v. smm 50 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 1951) WHI"v. STATE 432 So. 2d 44 (.Fla.1983) - WEISS v. smm 341 So. 2d 528 (Fla, 3rd D.C.A. 1977) -xv- 40 28 34 34 .. 34 76 40 58 I 81 , 77 I 68 50 61 69 49 62 83 83 60, 61, 63 69 83 61, 63
mmv, STATE 2d =la. 1st D.C.A, 1982). WHIrnV. smm 2d m Fla. 1978) WIrnXV. smTE 367. 2 d m (Fla. 1979) WILLLAm v. smm 110 So. 2d 6mla. 1959) WTTT*TqMS V. STAm 3136 So. 2d 5mla. 1980) WTmNSKY v. smm 360 So. 2d 76-a. 1978) WIISONV. smm -. 2dr(Fla. 1974) wmv. smm mso. 2 d m (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1981) wT?T v. STAm -So. 2 d 4 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1982) WRIGHT v. STATE 3-48. 2d*mFla. 1st D.C.A. 1977) WRIGHT v. SWTE 402. 2dw(Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1981) Statutes i?! 90.609 Fla. Stat. (1981) 90.610(2) Fla. Stat. (1981) 8 90.801(21 (b) Fla. Stat. (1981) 921.141 Fla. Stat. (1981) 921.141(5) (b) Fla. Stat. (1981) 921.141 (5) (c) Fla. Stat. (1981) 3 921.141(5) (d) Fla. Stat. (1981) 921.141(5) (e) Fla. Stat, (1981) § 921.141(5) (f) Fla. Stat. (.1981) 921.141(.5) Chl Fla. Stat. (19812 921,141(5) (1) Fla. Stat. (1981) 5 921.141 (61 (b) Fla. Stat. (1981) 8 921,141(6) (f) Fla. Stat. (19811 -mi- 84 46 69 54 38, 39 83 60, 62 45 55 40 53 32, 33 56 59 70 72 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73
Page 1 and 2: RPPEAL FffQM THE CIRCUIT COURIT OF
Page 3 and 4: V TRIAL COuIiT EXRED IN FAILING TO
Page 5 and 6: UNRELATED O??F'ENSE AS EVIDENCE OF
Page 7 and 8: ACEEY. mm, 33tlTo~7"T% (Fla. 4th ;D
Page 9 and 10: c?JME3IEV. smm 345 So. 2 d m CURRYV
Page 11 and 12: i%W'HW v. STATE j// So'.' 2d 7807Fl
Page 13 and 14: MCMILLANV. smm 4119 So. 2d 1-la. 3r
Page 15: 0 PRamCE v. STATE 337 So, 2d 7 n l
Page 19 and 20: 0 INTRODUCTION The appellant, Fbber
Page 21 and 22: of Other Crbs, Wrongs, or Acts. (R.
Page 23 and 24: 0 (T. 1128-1129).crooVer said nothi
Page 25 and 26: 0 going to kill "the mther fucker",
Page 27 and 28: this would alleviate any problem be
Page 29 and 30: took out his knife and stabbed Padg
Page 31 and 32: (T, 1342-1343). mng's rmther disapp
Page 33 and 34: he said it, "nobdy paid any mbd to
Page 35 and 36: told the defendant to "back off". (
Page 37 and 38: and said, Yh ny God". (T. 1260). tw
Page 39 and 40: out of the cay. and walked around b
Page 41 and 42: WHEXFER THE THE JUHI UPON THE LAW Q
Page 43 and 44: IX X WHlTIWB THE TRIAL ERRED IN m I
Page 45 and 46: XVIII WHEXfER THE TRUG COUW: FBRED
Page 47 and 48: they were afraid of being killed by
Page 49 and 50: ut munsel could not argue it becaus
Page 51 and 52: to the co-defendant, who continued
Page 53 and 54: participate in the killing, 2. If t
Page 55 and 56: Brother Caps. (T. 1185) (4). the de
Page 57 and 58: So. 2d 583 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1983).
Page 59 and 60: EXPW AND JTETIFY PLEA BARWWNG WITH
Page 61 and 62: type of rebuke counsel received. on
Page 63 and 64: utilized the stature of his office
Page 65 and 66: likewise improper for the State Att
Page 67 and 68:
Payment of mney to a witness for an
Page 69 and 70:
the prosecutor informed a juror onc
Page 71 and 72:
the fiream or threatened Padgett wi
Page 73 and 74:
from the operation of discowry rule
Page 75 and 76:
I resides. Stanley, supra; - Florid
Page 77 and 78:
Pernutting the reputation testby. o
Page 79 and 80:
little probative value w kn it is c
Page 81 and 82:
- The fact that a defendant refused
Page 83 and 84:
The United States Supre court has s
Page 85 and 86:
'BE general rule is that statements
Page 87 and 88:
The general rule is that a witness'
Page 89 and 90:
any person the defense "expects to
Page 91 and 92:
CR, 6167 T, 58-7 Penalty (R. 16-31
Page 93 and 94:
Sheppard's necklace and ring me tak
Page 95 and 96:
(-TT* 1032, 10491. An execution-sty
Page 97 and 98:
(5) W ilm Urgmn, the defendant's si
Page 99 and 100:
The defense also argued for mitigat
Page 101 and 102:
mitigating circumstance in a capita
Page 103:
CFRI'IFICATE OF SERVTCE I HEREBY CE
show all

Fla. Stat, (1981) - Florida State University College of Law

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?