Fla. Stat, (1981) - Florida State University College of Law

WHEZHER THE TRIAL aURT ERRJ2D IN DWING THE
DEFENDANT'S MCYI'ION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENIS,
AD4ISSIONS, AND ~ S I O N AND S IN PERMITTING
THE STATE To USE THOSE S m w IN ITS CASE
IN CHIEF, IN VIOLATION QF THE FIETH, SIXTH, AND
I%- AMNDEWE TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTTON
AND ARTICLE I, SmION 9 AND 16 OF T€E CCRJSTLTUTTON
OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA.
WHETHER m TRUV, a)uRT FmED IN PERMITTING THE
STATE TO USE THE DEEE"C'S STATEMENIS W E AT
?HE ARREST FOR AN UNRELATED QFEENSE AS mDENCI3
OF GUILT, IVVD IN SO IXSWCI'ING TfE JURY, IN VIOLATION OF TJ3E DEFEM3ANI"S DUE P-S RIGHT
A FAIR TlUAL, AS GuFlRANTEED BY !IE l3-
To THE U.S. mTITUTIOJSJ IWD ARTICLE I,
SECTIONS 9 OF !I333 FLQRI'CIA CONSTITUTION.
WHETHER THE TNAL COURT ERRED IN PRMIlBITING DEFENSE
~UNSEL F"4 ASKING STATE WImS DENISE LDNG ABOUT
HER STATUS ON PFORATTON, IN VIOLATION OF THE D m ' S
RIGHT TO CDNFWNTATION AS m D BY THE SMTH AND
FOUR!EENM AMENaMENTS TO TJB US. m?ZTUTION AND
ARTIQ;E: I, SECTION 16 OF THE FIDRIDA CONSTIWI~.
XVII
WHEI'HER THE TlUAL COURT ERRED IN ovE3I-FUGING DEFENSE
OEJECC'IONS AND FALLING TCl DFCLARF, A MISTRIAL WHEN TE
PROS- INTWDUCED EVIDENCE OF PFZOR CONSISTENT
S7XFPENE BY WITNESS BILLY LDNG BmKI3 'XHE WITNESS'S
CREDLBTLITY HAD BEEN AmmD, IN VIOMTION OF 2 90.801
(2) (b), FZA. STAT. (19811, AM3 TEE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE
OF THE: FIFTH AND l?3- lW"E TO TJlB U, S,
CONSnmON AND WKt'ICiX If SECI'ICIPJ 9 OF T€€E FLc>RIDA
CCPJSTITUTION.
Page -26-