29.12.2012 Views

Geoffrey Greatrex (2005). Byzantium and the East in - Kaveh Farrokh

Geoffrey Greatrex (2005). Byzantium and the East in - Kaveh Farrokh

Geoffrey Greatrex (2005). Byzantium and the East in - Kaveh Farrokh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Cambridge Companion to <strong>the</strong> Age of Just<strong>in</strong>ian<br />

he relied on o<strong>the</strong>rs for his descriptions of <strong>the</strong>se regions. Indeed, few<br />

Roman traders ventured fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>East</strong> than Himyar, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Indian Ocean was very limited. 71 In <strong>the</strong> 510s a Jewish Himyarite<br />

ruler, Dhu Nuwas, sought to stem <strong>the</strong> rise of Roman <strong>and</strong> Ethiopian<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region. He executed some Roman merchants, organised<br />

<strong>the</strong> persecution of Christians <strong>in</strong> his k<strong>in</strong>gdom, <strong>and</strong> even attempted<br />

to form an alliance with <strong>the</strong> Lakhmids. 72 However, his efforts served<br />

only to persuade <strong>the</strong> Romans <strong>and</strong> Ethiopians to make common cause<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st him, culm<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a successful <strong>in</strong>vasion of Himyar <strong>in</strong> 525 by <strong>the</strong><br />

Ethiopian k<strong>in</strong>g Ella Asbeha <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> imposition of an Ethiopian ruler;<br />

<strong>the</strong> Romans contributed a substantial fleet to <strong>the</strong> operation. 73 It was<br />

this favourable situation, perhaps coupled with <strong>the</strong> renewal of major<br />

hostilities to <strong>the</strong> north, that prompted <strong>the</strong> emperor to seek a new way<br />

to bypass <strong>the</strong> Persian silk monopoly: “He purposed that <strong>the</strong> Ethiopians,<br />

by purchas<strong>in</strong>g silk from India <strong>and</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g it among <strong>the</strong> Romans,<br />

might <strong>the</strong>mselves ga<strong>in</strong> much money, while caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Romans to<br />

profit <strong>in</strong> only one way, namely, that <strong>the</strong>y no longer be compelled to<br />

pay over <strong>the</strong>ir money to <strong>the</strong>ir enemy” (Procopius, Wars, 1.20.9, trans.<br />

Dew<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

The emperor’s logic was sound, but he underestimated <strong>the</strong> strength<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Persian grip. As Procopius relates (Wars, 1.20.12), Sasanian traders<br />

completely dom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>the</strong> Indian Ocean <strong>and</strong> were able to buy up all <strong>the</strong><br />

silk arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Sri Lanka from fur<strong>the</strong>r east; consequently, <strong>the</strong> Ethiopian<br />

traders were never able to buy directly from <strong>the</strong> exporters. 74 With<br />

<strong>the</strong> conclusion of <strong>the</strong> Eternal Peace <strong>in</strong> 532 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> overthrow of <strong>the</strong><br />

Ethiopian ruler of Himyar around <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiative came<br />

to noth<strong>in</strong>g. Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Arabia cont<strong>in</strong>ued to <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>the</strong> major powers,<br />

however. A strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dication of its importance comes <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>scription<br />

from Marib of 542. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a war between <strong>the</strong> new ruler of Himyar,<br />

a Christian named Abraha, <strong>and</strong> his rivals, <strong>the</strong> dam at Marib, vital for<br />

<strong>the</strong> irrigation of a large area, collapsed. The warr<strong>in</strong>g parties united to<br />

rebuild it, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scription record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> work it is reported that<br />

embassies arrived not only from <strong>the</strong> Lakhmid chief Mundhir <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Jafnid rulers Harith <strong>and</strong> Abu Karib, but also from both <strong>the</strong> Persian <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Roman rulers. What exactly <strong>the</strong>ir mission was is unclear, but <strong>the</strong><br />

ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g was clearly an important one. Eventually, <strong>in</strong> 570, follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

an appeal from <strong>the</strong> Himyarites, <strong>the</strong> Persians <strong>in</strong>tervened directly <strong>and</strong><br />

annexed <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom to <strong>the</strong>ir empire. 75<br />

The issue of <strong>the</strong> silk trade did not disappear with <strong>the</strong> failure of Just<strong>in</strong>ian’s<br />

Ethiopian venture. Although silkworms were <strong>in</strong>troduced to <strong>the</strong><br />

Roman Empire <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 550s by eastern monks, Roman dependence<br />

502<br />

Cambridge Companions Onl<strong>in</strong>e © Cambridge University Press, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!