Geoffrey Greatrex (2005). Byzantium and the East in - Kaveh Farrokh
Geoffrey Greatrex (2005). Byzantium and the East in - Kaveh Farrokh
Geoffrey Greatrex (2005). Byzantium and the East in - Kaveh Farrokh
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Cambridge Companion to <strong>the</strong> Age of Just<strong>in</strong>ian<br />
adopted <strong>in</strong> 562, although he preferred to make several years’ payments<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r. 18 The real danger <strong>in</strong> such a policy was <strong>the</strong> appearance it gave –<br />
that <strong>the</strong> Romans were, <strong>in</strong> effect, tributaries of <strong>the</strong> Persians. This could<br />
be <strong>and</strong> was exploited by <strong>the</strong> Persians, but its impact closer to home<br />
was more damag<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>the</strong> people (<strong>and</strong> many of <strong>the</strong> nobility) of Constant<strong>in</strong>ople<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern prov<strong>in</strong>ces preferred a tougher approach to<br />
<strong>the</strong> traditional enemy. There was general resentment at <strong>the</strong> lavish hospitality<br />
accorded to <strong>the</strong> Persian ambassador Yazdgushnasp <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 550s,<br />
particularly at a time when hostilities were still active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caucasus.<br />
Roman comm<strong>and</strong>ers, unhappy with <strong>the</strong> softer l<strong>in</strong>e be<strong>in</strong>g pursued by<br />
<strong>the</strong> emperor, might even sabotage or underm<strong>in</strong>e negotiations on <strong>the</strong><br />
frontier on occasion. 19<br />
As we shall see, Just<strong>in</strong>ian appears to have ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a consistent<br />
policy towards Persia right from <strong>the</strong> outset of his reign; <strong>in</strong> today’s terms,<br />
one might call it “constructive engagement.” Persian embassies were<br />
treated with courtesy <strong>and</strong> proposals for peace well received. Hostile <strong>in</strong>cursions<br />
were met by force (when possible), but <strong>in</strong>vasions of Persian<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>s were undertaken seldom <strong>and</strong> only <strong>in</strong> response to Persian attacks.<br />
Just<strong>in</strong>ian was prepared to pay for peace, whe<strong>the</strong>r a general peace<br />
or a truce conf<strong>in</strong>ed to part of <strong>the</strong> frontier, but took steps so as not to<br />
be perceived as weak or too ready to make concessions. He <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
sought to separate his payments from <strong>the</strong> actual terms of agreements, for<br />
<strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> treaty of 562, no doubt to give <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> appearance of<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g voluntary. 20 Maximum publicity was given to any success aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
<strong>the</strong> Persians, such as <strong>the</strong> victory of Belisarius at Dara <strong>in</strong> 530. Monuments<br />
were erected, works of history commissioned, <strong>and</strong> epigrams composed,<br />
<strong>in</strong> order to emphasise <strong>the</strong> emperor’s success <strong>and</strong> his victory over <strong>the</strong><br />
traditional enemy 21 (See Fig. 1). Such propag<strong>and</strong>a must not be taken<br />
at face value; ra<strong>the</strong>r, it assuaged public op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> served to emphasise<br />
<strong>the</strong> emperor’s personal <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> victory, even though he<br />
rarely left <strong>the</strong> capital.<br />
Persia <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sixth Century<br />
The sixth century <strong>in</strong> many ways marked <strong>the</strong> apogee of Sasanian rule. Not<br />
only was Persia itself prosperous <strong>and</strong> powerful, but <strong>the</strong> rul<strong>in</strong>g dynasty, at<br />
least under Kavadh (488–496, 499–531) <strong>and</strong> Khusro I (531–579), was also<br />
firmly established <strong>in</strong> its ascendancy. In <strong>the</strong> late fifth century, however,<br />
Persian prospects had seemed very bleak. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reign of Peroz<br />
(459–484), a new <strong>and</strong> dangerous enemy, <strong>the</strong> Hephthalite Huns, appeared<br />
482<br />
Cambridge Companions Onl<strong>in</strong>e © Cambridge University Press, 2006