29.12.2012 Views

sponge iron industry –past-present-future - SIMA

sponge iron industry –past-present-future - SIMA

sponge iron industry –past-present-future - SIMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Only the Medium is Pumped<br />

Reduced wear of the Heavy Medium feed pump and<br />

following piping – typical life time is doubled if feed<br />

is not pumped. Higher plant availability due to<br />

reduced blockages of piping and pump.<br />

The feed material remains into the slurry for a very<br />

short time as opposed to conical cyclones. Lower<br />

degradation of the feed material and products with<br />

following savings in water treatment.<br />

Minimal Contact of the Material with the<br />

Separator Wall<br />

Tri-Flo - The feed enters the separator at atmospheric<br />

pressure along the center of the separator, light<br />

material floats along the central axe, highly abrasive<br />

heavy material quickly reports to the wall and is<br />

discharged through the sink head positioned near<br />

the feed inlet.<br />

Cyclones – The feed is pumped with the separating<br />

medium and enters tangentially the separator near<br />

the light material outlet (vortex finder). Heavy and<br />

highly abrasive material rotate and wears the<br />

separator from the feed point all the way down to<br />

the opposite side where the sink outlet (spigot) is<br />

positioned.<br />

Improved Hydrodynamics Inside the Vessel<br />

The flow patterns inside cylindrical vessel is improved<br />

in comparison with more uniform centrifugal<br />

acceleration and a wider region of zero axial velocity<br />

particularly useful for difficult / high near gravity<br />

separations (high amounts of material of specific<br />

gravity near the separation gravity which is very<br />

common in India).<br />

High Sink Capacity<br />

The Tri-Flo technology has the highest sink capacity<br />

on the market for both the first and second stage<br />

allowing for wide variations in feed characteristics.<br />

Conical cyclones are notoriously sink limited.<br />

Larger Feed Top Size<br />

The Tri-Flo technology can accept larger particles<br />

than conical cyclones if comparing the same vessel<br />

diameter. This means that in smaller scale<br />

applications with acceptable coal liberation:<br />

l a single circuit (Tri-Flo) can operate the<br />

separation saving on the coarse coal circuit (static<br />

bath or jigs)<br />

l It is not necessary to reduce the feed top size to<br />

fit the vessel diameter<br />

As an example, assuming a 200 t/h application with<br />

good liberation at top size of 75mm. A single 700<br />

mm Tri-Flo can be installed, if a cyclone is installed<br />

for the capacity a 750 mm should be chosen but the<br />

feed material must be crushed at top size of 50 mm.<br />

As an alternative, to accommodate a top size of 75<br />

mm a 1000 mm should be installed. In both cases,<br />

the economical savings offered by the Tri-Flo are<br />

significant.<br />

Fine Media and Media Segregation<br />

Acceleration forces are necessary for the separation.<br />

Also the fine ferromagnetic powder used for the<br />

medium has the tendency to separate and the density<br />

of the sink medium is higher than the density of the<br />

float medium. This difference is called differential. If<br />

the differential is too high the separation sharpness<br />

is compromised and a finer medium shall be used.<br />

Finer medium is more expensive and more difficult<br />

to recover, hence the operational cost is higher.<br />

Cylindrical cyclones show lower differentials if<br />

compared with conical cyclones allowing coarser and<br />

less costly powder to be used.<br />

DynaFeedä System<br />

The patented DynaFeedä system allows sharper<br />

separation in the following separator. The more<br />

difficult the material to be processed the higher the<br />

advantages obtained with the DynaFeed system.<br />

Obviously, the DynaFeed system gives significant<br />

advantages with fine material (-4 mm) which is more<br />

difficult to process. During initial testing on a difficult<br />

separation, clean coal yield was increased as much<br />

as +25% if compared with the same separator<br />

operating without the DynaFeed system.<br />

JANUARY-2011/35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!