29.12.2012 Views

Ethnocentric vs. Regiocentric Consolidation in the Aerospace and

Ethnocentric vs. Regiocentric Consolidation in the Aerospace and

Ethnocentric vs. Regiocentric Consolidation in the Aerospace and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 designed to move from “an <strong>in</strong>dustrial age to an <strong>in</strong>formation age military” with fundamentally<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>t, network-centric, distributed forces capable of rapid decision superiority <strong>and</strong> massed effects<br />

across <strong>the</strong> battle-space. 83 Industrial-age warfare <strong>in</strong> WWI <strong>and</strong> WWII was characterised by large-<br />

scale battles. Achiev<strong>in</strong>g quantitative superiority by out-produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> enemy <strong>in</strong> terms of tanks,<br />

ships, planes, bombers, etc. was key to victory. In contrast, victory <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation-age wars is<br />

dependent on <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation of superior <strong>in</strong>telligence / reconnaissance <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> timely<br />

projection of accurate, massive firepower. 84 Information-age warfare leverages aerospace<br />

technology to first ga<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>telligence (through satellites, etc.) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n strike from a “safe”<br />

distance. 85<br />

Kosovo may well be <strong>the</strong> first war won through air power only. 86 In Afghanistan, America<br />

maximised <strong>the</strong> accuracy of its air strikes by <strong>in</strong>sert<strong>in</strong>g special forces with Afghan militias to allow<br />

for <strong>the</strong> targeted, laser-guided destruction of enemy forces. In Iraq, <strong>the</strong> Pentagon launched massive<br />

aerial bombardments followed by armoured Blitzkrieg operations. However, while airpower played<br />

a crucial role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> overthrow of Saddam Husse<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Taliban, subsequent counter<strong>in</strong>surgency<br />

operations <strong>in</strong> Iraq <strong>and</strong> Afghanistan demonstrate <strong>the</strong> importance of hav<strong>in</strong>g “boots on <strong>the</strong> ground” to<br />

stabilize a country after <strong>the</strong> high tech / high-<strong>in</strong>tensity fight<strong>in</strong>g is over. The future role of airpower <strong>in</strong><br />

(US) military strategy cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be <strong>the</strong> subject of heated debate. 87 Proponents of air power will<br />

also need to show how it can effectively contribute to <strong>the</strong> fight aga<strong>in</strong>st terrorists <strong>and</strong> WMD 88<br />

proliferation.<br />

82 RMA (Revolution <strong>in</strong> Military Affairs) is “a paradigm shift <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>and</strong> conduct of military operations which<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r renders obsolete or irrelevant one or more core competencies <strong>in</strong> a dom<strong>in</strong>ant player, or creates one or more new<br />

core competencies <strong>in</strong> some dimension of warfare, or both”. Hundley (1999) p. xiii<br />

83 DoD (2003) pp. 9-11<br />

84 “Arguably <strong>the</strong> most important s<strong>in</strong>gle proposition <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g contemporary American strategic thought <strong>in</strong> both<br />

official <strong>and</strong> unofficial circles is <strong>the</strong> identification of <strong>in</strong>formation as <strong>the</strong> key factor <strong>in</strong> military operations”. Freedman<br />

(2006) pp. 16-17<br />

85 The political vulnerability of Western leaders to troop casualties coupled with clear Western air superiority have<br />

created <strong>the</strong> “temptation of air power” as a “virtually risk-free military option”. Freedman (2006) pp. 61-65<br />

86 Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1991 Gulf War only 10 percent of <strong>the</strong> bombs used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US-led coalition air campaign were precisionguided<br />

weapons; dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1999 Kosovo War 90 percent of <strong>the</strong> bombs were guided by laser or GPS satellites. See<br />

(Byman & Waxman, 2000) for a more cautious <strong>and</strong> nuanced assessment of airpower’s role dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Kosovo War.<br />

87 “The US would not be <strong>the</strong> first apparently unbeatable military power to f<strong>in</strong>d itself undone by an <strong>in</strong>ability to take<br />

seriously or even to comprehend enemies that rely on <strong>the</strong>ir ability to emerge out of <strong>the</strong> shadows of civil society,<br />

preferr<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>or skirmish to major battle, accept<strong>in</strong>g no possibility for decisive victory but <strong>in</strong>stead aim<strong>in</strong>g to unsettle,<br />

harass, demoralise, humiliate <strong>and</strong> eventually to wear down <strong>the</strong>ir opponents”. Freedman (2006) pp. 5-6<br />

88 WMD = Weapons of Mass Destruction<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!