30.12.2012 Views

Maintaining Audio Quality in the Broadcast Facility 2011 - Orban

Maintaining Audio Quality in the Broadcast Facility 2011 - Orban

Maintaining Audio Quality in the Broadcast Facility 2011 - Orban

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Broadcast</strong>/Netcast <strong>Facility</strong> 35<br />

system to almost 19 bits <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> crucial midrange area, and is standard <strong>in</strong> CD master<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

There are many proprietary curves used by various manufacturers for noise<br />

shap<strong>in</strong>g, and each has a slightly different sound.<br />

It has been shown that pass<strong>in</strong>g noise shaped di<strong>the</strong>r through most classes of signal<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g and/or a D/A converter with non-monotonic behavior will destroy <strong>the</strong><br />

advantages of <strong>the</strong> noise shap<strong>in</strong>g by “fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>” <strong>the</strong> frequency areas where <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

noise-shaped signal had little energy. The result is usually poorer than if no noise<br />

shap<strong>in</strong>g had been used. For this reason, <strong>Orban</strong> has adopted a conservative approach<br />

to noise shap<strong>in</strong>g, recommend<strong>in</strong>g so-called “first-order highpass” noise shap<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

implement<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong> <strong>Orban</strong> products that allow di<strong>the</strong>r to be added to <strong>the</strong>ir digital<br />

output streams. First-order highpass noise shap<strong>in</strong>g provides a substantial improvement<br />

<strong>in</strong> resolution over simple white TPF di<strong>the</strong>r, but its total noise power is only 3dB<br />

higher than white TPF di<strong>the</strong>r. Therefore, if it is passed through additional signal<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g and/or an imperfect D/A converter, <strong>the</strong>re will be little noise penalty by<br />

comparison to more aggressive noise shap<strong>in</strong>g schemes.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> great benefits of <strong>the</strong> digitization of <strong>the</strong> signal path <strong>in</strong> broadcast<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

this: Once <strong>in</strong> digital form, <strong>the</strong> signal is far less subject to subtle degradation than it<br />

would be if it were <strong>in</strong> analog form, although <strong>in</strong> fixed po<strong>in</strong>t form it is still subject to<br />

clipp<strong>in</strong>g for reasons discussed earlier <strong>in</strong> this book. Short of be<strong>in</strong>g clipped or becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

entirely un-decodable, <strong>the</strong> worst that can happen to <strong>the</strong> signal is deterioration<br />

of noise-shaped di<strong>the</strong>r, and/or added jitter.<br />

Jitter is a time-base error. The only jitter than cannot be removed from <strong>the</strong> signal is<br />

jitter that was added <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al analog-to-digital conversion process. All subsequent<br />

jitter can be completely removed <strong>in</strong> a sort of “time-base correction” operation,<br />

accurately recover<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al signal. The only limitation is <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> “time-base correction” circuitry, which requires sophisticated design to reduce<br />

added jitter below audibility. This “time-base correction” usually occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

digital <strong>in</strong>put receiver, although fur<strong>the</strong>r stages can be used downstream.<br />

Sample rate converters can <strong>in</strong>troduce jitter <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> digital doma<strong>in</strong> because <strong>the</strong>y resample<br />

<strong>the</strong> signal, much like A/D converters. <strong>Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g</strong> lowest jitter <strong>in</strong> a system<br />

requires synchroniz<strong>in</strong>g all devices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> audio cha<strong>in</strong> to a common wordclock or<br />

AES11 signal. This elim<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>the</strong> need to perform cascaded sample rate conversions<br />

on <strong>the</strong> signals flow<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> facility. Good wordclock generators have very<br />

low jitter (also known as “phase noise”) and allow <strong>the</strong> cascaded devices to perform<br />

at <strong>the</strong>ir best.<br />

There are several pervasive myths regard<strong>in</strong>g digital audio:<br />

One myth is that long reconstruction filters smear <strong>the</strong> transient response of<br />

digital audio, and that <strong>the</strong>re is thus an advantage to us<strong>in</strong>g a reconstruction filter<br />

with a short impulse response, even if this means roll<strong>in</strong>g off frequencies above 10<br />

kHz. Several commercial high-end D-to-A converters operate on exactly this mistaken<br />

assumption. This is one area of digital audio where <strong>in</strong>tuition is particularly<br />

deceptive.<br />

The sole purpose of a reconstruction filter is to fill <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g pieces between <strong>the</strong><br />

digital samples. These days, symmetrical f<strong>in</strong>ite-impulse-response filters are used for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!