30.12.2012 Views

Maintaining Audio Quality in the Broadcast Facility 2011 - Orban

Maintaining Audio Quality in the Broadcast Facility 2011 - Orban

Maintaining Audio Quality in the Broadcast Facility 2011 - Orban

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Broadcast</strong>/Netcast <strong>Facility</strong> 51<br />

Conventional AM, FM, or TV audio processors that employ pre-emphasis/deemphasis<br />

and/or clipp<strong>in</strong>g peak limiters do not work well with perceptual audio coders<br />

such as AAC/HE-AACv1/v2. The pre-emphasis/de-emphasis limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se processors<br />

unnecessarily limits high frequency headroom. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>ir clipp<strong>in</strong>g limiters<br />

create high frequency components—distortion—that <strong>the</strong> perceptual audio coders<br />

would o<strong>the</strong>rwise not encode.<br />

In addition, several audio process<strong>in</strong>g manufacturers offer pre-process<strong>in</strong>g claimed to<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imize codec artifacts at low bit rates. <strong>Orban</strong>’s technology is called PreCode.<br />

This manipulates several aspects of <strong>the</strong> audio to m<strong>in</strong>imize artifacts caused by low<br />

bitrate codecs, ensur<strong>in</strong>g consistent loudness and texture from one source to <strong>the</strong><br />

next. PreCode <strong>in</strong>cludes special audio band detection algorithms that are energy and<br />

spectrum aware. This can improve codec performance on some codecs by reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

audio process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duced codec artifacts, even with program material that has been<br />

preprocessed by o<strong>the</strong>r process<strong>in</strong>g than Optimod.<br />

Summary<br />

<strong>Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g</strong> a high level of broadcast/netcast audio quality is a very difficult task,<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g constant dedication and a cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g cooperation between <strong>the</strong> programm<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, and computer IT departments.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> constantly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g quality of home and mobile receivers and stereo<br />

gear, <strong>the</strong> broadcast audience more and more easily perceives <strong>the</strong> results of such<br />

dedication and cooperation. One suspects that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future, FM, DAR, and netcasts<br />

will have to deliver ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g quality to compete successfully with <strong>the</strong> many<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r program sources vy<strong>in</strong>g for audience attention, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g CD’s, DVD’s, Blu-ray<br />

disks, digital audio, subscription television, direct satellite broadcast, DTV, stream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

programm<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> Internet, high resolution downloads and who knows how<br />

many o<strong>the</strong>rs!<br />

The human ear is astonish<strong>in</strong>gly sensitive; perceptive people are often amazed when<br />

<strong>the</strong>y detect ra<strong>the</strong>r subtle improvements to <strong>the</strong> broadcast audio cha<strong>in</strong> while listen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to an <strong>in</strong>expensive car radio. Conversely, <strong>the</strong> FM broadcast/reception system can exaggerate<br />

flaws <strong>in</strong> audio quality. <strong>Audio</strong> processors (even OPTIMOD) are especially<br />

prone to exaggerat<strong>in</strong>g such flaws.<br />

In this discussion, we have tried to touch upon <strong>the</strong> basic issues and techniques underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

audio quality <strong>in</strong> radio operations, and to provide useful <strong>in</strong>formation for<br />

evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cost-effectiveness of equipment or techniques that are proposed to<br />

improve audio quality. In particular, we concluded that today’s high-quality IC<br />

opamps are ideally suited for use as amplification elements <strong>in</strong> broadcast, and that<br />

compromises <strong>in</strong> digital standards, computer sound cards, disk playback, and tape<br />

quality are all likely to be audible on <strong>the</strong> air. The all-digital signal path is probably<br />

<strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle most important quality improvement that a station can make, but <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer must be aware of issues such as lossy compression (particularly<br />

when cascaded), word length, sample rate, headroom, jitter, and di<strong>the</strong>r, and<br />

0dBFS+-<strong>in</strong>duced clipp<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!