ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHARLOTTE GATEWAY STATION

Table 3.1-2. Employment Trends and Projections...............................................................3.1-3
Table 3.1-3. Land Use Acreage...........................................................................................3.1-7
Table 3.1-4. Study Area Tax Rates .....................................................................................3.1-9
Table 3.1-5. Projected Elderly Population Adjacent To Proposed CGS ............................3.1-10
Table 3.1-6. Projected Transit Dependent Population Adjacent To Proposed CGS .........3.1-10
Table 3.1-7. Government Finance Impacts by CGS..........................................................3.1-11
Table 3.3-1. 2004/2005 Crime Statistics for Municipalities in Project Area .........................3.3-2
Table 3.5-1. National Ambient Air Quality Standards ..........................................................3.5-2
Table 3.6-1. Summary of Projected Future Noise Impacts at the CGS ...............................3.6-1
Table 3.7-1. Federal-Listed Protected Species by County ..................................................3.7-7
Table 3.7-2. State-Listed Protected Species by County......................................................3.7-7
Table 3.8-1. Surface Water Resources of the Bi-County Area............................................3.8-2
Table 3.10-1. NRHP Listed or Eligible Historic Architectural Properties in
Project APE ...................................................................................................3.10-2
Table 3.12-1. Potential Hazardous Material Sites ...............................................................3.12-6
Table 3.12-2. Potential Hazardous Material Sites Near NCCR Stations .............................3.12-7
Table 3.13-1 Reasonably Foreseeable Development in the Project Area..........................3.13-1
Table 3.13-2 CGS Secondary Effects ................................................................................3.13-4
Table 3.13-3 Mitigation Measures for Secondary Impacts .................................................3.13-5
Table 3.15-1. Access to Stations for Minority and Low-Income Communities.....................3.15-5
Table 4.2-1. Level of Service Criteria for Intersections........................................................4.3-4
Table 4.2-2: Existing Conditions Analysis Results...............................................................4.3-5
Table 4.2-3: On-Site At-Grade Parking Totals.....................................................................4.3-6
Table 4.2-4: 2010 Build Year Scenario LOS Results.........................................................4.3-10
Table 4.2-5: 2010 Curbside Approach Link Delay and Speed Comparison ......................4.3-11
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure S.1-1. Concept Renderings of Charlotte Gateway Station........................................... S-3
Figure S.3-1. CATS Rapid Transit System Map...................................................................... S-6
Figure S.3-2: South East High speed Rail Corridor................................................................. S-8
Figure 1.1-1. Charlotte Gateway Station Project Site ...........................................................1.1-3
Figure 1.1-2. Concept Renderings of Charlotte Gateway Station.........................................1.1-5
Figure 1.1-3. Access and Circulation at the Charlotte Gateway Station...............................1.1-6
Figure 1.2-1. CATS Rapid Transit System Map....................................................................1.2-8
Charlotte Gateway Station v EA