03.01.2013 Views

WD200711ZA-sm.pdf

WD200711ZA-sm.pdf

WD200711ZA-sm.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Household<br />

Electric Shavers<br />

The typical guy spends a full day every year removing facial hair. Want<br />

to save time? You could go Grizzly Adams—and attract more bears than<br />

babes—or invest in an electric. —CHRISTOPHER NULL<br />

Braun Pulsonic 9595<br />

$269 • braun.com<br />

A bruiser at nearly half a pound, the<br />

Pulsonic justifies its size and weight<br />

with the <strong>sm</strong>oothest electric shave<br />

we’ve had. The key seems to be<br />

the combination of a pulsing head<br />

(10,000 vibrations per minute) and the<br />

shaver’s Power-Comb system, a row<br />

of teeth between the two foils that lift<br />

up stubborn hairs and position them<br />

for cutting. The base station cleans<br />

the shaver with alcohol and charges it.<br />

WIRED Hands down, the best electric<br />

we’ve tried. Multiple levels of pivot<br />

help the shaver hug the face. Vibration<br />

system is comfortable, almost massagelike:<br />

Shaving actually feels good.<br />

TIRED Base station has huge footprint.<br />

Trimmer sticks out at odd angle.<br />

Cleaning system is loud.<br />

EDITORS’<br />

PICK<br />

Gillette Fusion<br />

Power Phantom<br />

$12 • gillettefusion.com<br />

The razor world knows no limits when<br />

it comes to gimmickry—witness the<br />

absurd one-upmanship waged over<br />

the number of blades on a disposable,<br />

the butt of endless parodies. The Phantom<br />

has an eye-rolling five blades, plus<br />

a slot for an AAA battery that causes<br />

the whole thing to vibrate with “micropulses”<br />

that supposedly reduce friction<br />

and increase glide. But not only was<br />

the vibration technology disconcerting,<br />

we actually got a better shave—quite<br />

good, in fact—when we shut it off.<br />

WIRED Single blade on back works<br />

well for tight spots. Shower-safe.<br />

TIRED Head seems outsized. At up to<br />

$14 for a four-pack, blades are pricey. No<br />

reason to pay extra for battery power.<br />

Philips Norelco<br />

arcitec 1090X<br />

$250 • philips.com<br />

Rotary shavers advance again with<br />

the arcitec, a svelte and lightweight<br />

tool that’s as good as rotaries get.<br />

The breakthrough: heads mounted on<br />

a wildly swiveling pivot, which follows<br />

the face closer than any other model<br />

we’ve seen. Too bad a <strong>sm</strong>ooth shave<br />

requires a fair amount of do-over<br />

work. The arcitec took twice as long<br />

as the Pulsonic, with poorer results.<br />

WIRED Lithe; glides easily over skin.<br />

Includes two charging options: a hard<br />

travel case and an upright stand. LED<br />

indicates charge time remaining.<br />

TIRED So lightweight it’s difficult<br />

to control with precision, especially<br />

on narrow regions like upper lip. Still<br />

missed hairs after lengthy shaves.<br />

Remington<br />

CleanXchange<br />

$60 • remington-products.com<br />

On paper, the CleanXchange looks<br />

perfect. A 60-minute charge gives<br />

you 20 shaves, the device can<br />

be used on battery power or while<br />

plugged in, and five minutes of AC<br />

gives you plenty of time to finish<br />

your face. But when razor meets<br />

beard, it just doesn’t cut it: The<br />

Remington was consistently and<br />

by far the worst shaver we tested.<br />

WIRED Compact and only 6.3 ounces.<br />

TIRED Un-ergonomic. Terrible at cutting<br />

longer hairs. Disposable heads<br />

mean no cleaning but are wasteful<br />

and, at $6 each, not cheap. So loud it’s<br />

actually painful to eardrums when<br />

working on sideburns. Trimmer attachment<br />

failed on each of two test units.<br />

WIRED TEST<br />

1 1 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!