06.01.2013 Views

Etude stratigraphique, pétrographique et diagénétique des grès d ...

Etude stratigraphique, pétrographique et diagénétique des grès d ...

Etude stratigraphique, pétrographique et diagénétique des grès d ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00534181, version 1 - 9 Nov 2010<br />

Chapter III<br />

3.1.1. Reservoir Rocks<br />

The lowest part of the Kerio Basin infill is of sedimentary origin and possibly of Paleogene age. At<br />

the southern end of the Kerio Basin, arkosic sandstones known as the “Kimwarer Formation” outcrop along<br />

the footwall of the western faulted margin of the basin - the Elgeyo Border Fault, where they overlie the<br />

Precambrian basement. Renaut <strong>et</strong> al. (1999) <strong>des</strong>cribe green, waxy, laminated tuffaceous shales associated to<br />

these sandstones. To the east, in the Baringo Basin, the ol<strong>des</strong>t sediments exposed along the western faulted<br />

side of the basin – the Saimo Border Fault - are known as the “Kamego Formation” (Fig. 7). They are mainly<br />

arkosic fluviatile sandstones sourced from Precambrian rocks (Chapman <strong>et</strong> al., 1978; Renaut <strong>et</strong> al., 1999).<br />

These Kimwarer and Kamego sediments represent the earliest sections of the Kerio and Baringo Basins infill,<br />

possibly indicating fluvial and lacustrine environments similar to the ones found to the north in the Lokichar<br />

and North Kerio Basins. Fluvial n<strong>et</strong>works of Paleogene age draining the basement floor of the Kerio and<br />

Baringo Basins are interpr<strong>et</strong>ed as flowing northward, feeding the Lokichar-North Kerio Basins (Morley and<br />

Wescott, 1999; Tiercelin <strong>et</strong> al., 2004). The Paleogene history of the Kerio and Baringo Basins is unfortunately<br />

poorly known because outcrops are scarce and poorly exposed and due to the absence of sufficient seismic<br />

data and exploration wells. Nevertheless, possible similarity b<strong>et</strong>ween the Kimwarer-Kamego Formations and<br />

the Lokichar-North Kerio sediments may encourage oil exploration in Blocks 13T and 12A (presently licensed<br />

to Platform Resources).<br />

The Miocene history of the Kerio-Baringo half-grabens is much b<strong>et</strong>ter documented by sediments and<br />

lavas outcropping along the Elgeyo Border Fault and the western flank of the Tugen Hills fault block (Saimo<br />

Border Fault) (Fig. 41). Thick sedimentary deposits are found interbedded b<strong>et</strong>ween the volcanic units and<br />

relate to the existence of at least two wide lacustrine domains known as the Tambach Lake and the Ngorora<br />

Lake, both dated middle Miocene. In the Kerio Basin, more than 2 km of volcanic rocks fill have been deposited<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ween 23 and 15 Ma, then b<strong>et</strong>ween 14 and 7 Ma (Chapman <strong>et</strong> al., 1978) (Fig. 41a). The ol<strong>des</strong>t sequence<br />

of Neogene age is the Tambach Formation. Up to 400 m of colluvial, fluvial and lacustrine sediments are<br />

exposed discontinuously along the Elgeyo Border Fault, and lie upon an irregular topography of basement<br />

rocks (Ego, 1994; Renaut <strong>et</strong> al., 1999). The upper limit of the Tambach Formation is provided by the overlying<br />

Uasin Gishu Phonolite Formation (<strong>des</strong>cribed by Lippard, 1973), that is dated from 14.5-12 Ma. The overall<br />

Tambach depositional sequence is formed by alluvial fan and gravelly braided stream deposits near the base<br />

of the sequence, followed by sandy braided deposits, to shallow deltaic and lacustrine sediments at the top part<br />

of the sequence (Renaut <strong>et</strong> al., 1999).<br />

The Ngorora Formation is of Miocene age but younger than the Tambach Formation (Bishop and<br />

Chapman, 1970) (Fig. 41). The 400-m thick Ngorora sediments lie upon lavas of the Tiim Phonolite Formation<br />

dated 13.1 Ma and are unconformably overlain by the Ewalel Phonolite Formation dated 8.5 Ma (Hill, 1999).<br />

Clastic sediments in the Ngorora Formation are mainly fluvial sediments and lahar deposits, and have been<br />

Figure 41. (a) Interpr<strong>et</strong>ed stratigraphic series of the Central Kenya Rift, from the Kerio Basin to the west, to the Baringo<br />

Basin to the east. The logs for the Kerio Basin (SEE; South Elgeyo Escarpment; NEE, North Elgeyo Escarpment; KB,<br />

Kerio Basin; TH, Tugen Hills, eastern flank of the Kerio Basin) show the stratigraphic position of the Paleogene(?) old<br />

Kimwarer and Kamego Formations, of unknown thickness but presenting an interesting reservoir potential (see KB and<br />

TH logs), and the Neogene Tambach and Ngorora Formations. To the east, the Baringo Basin (BB) log shows the deep<br />

structure of the basin below the 2 km-thick Samburu Basalts (21-11 Ma). This deep part of the basin can offer potential<br />

source rocks and reservoirs of Paleogene age, but this can only be confirmed by deep drilling. (b) Simplified diagram of<br />

the Central Kenya Rift (Kerio-Baringo Basins) evolution from Paleogene times to present Central Kenya Rift. The early<br />

stages of rifting are contemporaneous of the Lokichar-North Kerio rifting events in the Northern Kenya Rift. But, contrary<br />

to the case of the Lokichar Basin, basin evolution in the Kerio Basin has continued until upper Miocene, and up to present<br />

in the Baringo Basin (modified from Hautot <strong>et</strong> al., 2000; Tiercelin and Lezzar, 2002).<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!