Architecture and Ideology

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dr HURIYE GÜRDALLI, Professor Near East University, hgurdalli@neu.edu.tr, narhanim6@gmail.com Dr UMUT KOLDAS, Assistant Professor Cyprus International University, ukoldas@ciu.edu.tr, ukoldas@yahoo.com COLUMNS OF COLONIALISM: REPRESENTATION OF POLITICAL POWER IN THE OFFICIAL BUILDINGS OF BRITISH RULE IN COLONIAL CYPRUS Abstract | British colonial rule had a significant influence on socio‐spatial infrastructure, architectural design, and urban planning of Cyprus. The architectural history of Cyprus under the British rule can be traced through analysis of three periods. The first period witnessed the rejection of the pre‐existent dominant architectural styles as the native forms of architectural identity of the island. In this respect, the British urban planners conducted surveys of Cyprus and developed alternative architectural and urban designs in order to transform socio‐spatial infrastructure in the island during this period by undermining the pre‐dominant “Ottoman style and its vernacular derivatives”. The second period started in 1920s and lasted in early 1950s. Architectural design of this era was shaped by the increasing prosperity of the British rule due to maritime trade, concerns of British rulers about consolidating their political power in the island as well as discarding the waves of Cypriot nationalisms, which could challenge their authority in the island. Therefore the British architectural practices and urban planning policies turned to the local architectural styles and reflected the “Cypriot mélange” that was composed of Byzantine, Medieval ‐ Venetian and Lusignan‐, Ottoman and the colonial characteristics. The final stage of British colonial rule took place between the early 1950s and 1960. This period was characterized by the challenge of the Cypriot nationalism against the island’s colonizer. Notwithstanding some remarkable improvements in the urban planning and architectural styles, this period witnessed a significant decrease in the colonial architectural activities due to the increasing unrest and political instability in the island. Among various other architectural practices, construction of administrative official buildings had been an important indicator of change and continuity in the colonial architectural philosophy in different periods of the British rule. This study aims to explore representation of power in the official buildings which were constructed in Cyprus during the colonial period under the rule of British Empire between 1878 and 1960. Referring to constructed buildings, archival documents, interviews with the architectural historians and the architects of the time the paper will analyze the changes and continuities in the architectural policies, forms, designs and practices in the different periods of British colonial rule in the island. Key words | British Colonialism, Cyprus, architectural designs, urban planning, official buildings, representation of power 107
108 JELENA ŽIVKOVIĆ, Assistant Professor Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade, j_zivkovic@ptt.rs KSENIJA LALOVIĆ, Assistant Professor Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade, ksenija.lalovic@gmail.com ZORAN ĐUKANOVIĆ, Assistant Professor Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade, duke@arh.bg.ac.rs ECOLOGY IN PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLANNING AND DESIGN SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY OR IDEOLOGY? Abstract | Today, at the beginning of the 21st century, ecology is not "only" a science or a rationale for "green" philosophies and political actions. Due to global recognition of environmental crisis, and the role that cities play in it, ecologically sound urban development became institutionalized. "Ecology" becomes a buzzword for urban development and "re‐imaging" the cities in competition for new inhabitants and investments. It starts to be interpreted as a new planning and design ideology. Being a place where urban and natural systems meet and interact, public open spaces are important both as a reflection of environmental problems and as a part of their solution. Besides their ecological importance, public open spaces have various roles in urban life and are constituents of urban identity. As well, as a social scene, they are places of special importance for the social and cultural interaction and integration. This multifaceted nature of public space keeps open the debate on the quality of public space, and the role that ecology should play it their planning and design. This paper aims to contribute to the debate by using case study methodology to explore the ways in which ecology conceptually relates to public open space planning and design and by critically evaluating material consequences of this relations. We argue that the way the meaning and content of ecology is conceptualized, shapes the way it is integrated in planning and design theory, which consequently, shape our urban environment. Since ecology as a science evolves over time, it is important to keep its relation to planning and design open for new interpretations. Therefore, ecology should not be integrated to public space planning and design as a "solution" but as a way of approaching public space quality problems. Interpreted in that way, integration of ecology to planning and design theory opens up the space for creative practice. Key words | public open space, ecology, science, philosophy, ideology
Page 2 and 3:
1 International Conference Architec
Page 4:
Organized by Faculty of Architectur
Page 8:
INTRODUCTION The Faculty of Archite
Page 11 and 12:
‐ The rights to housing, work and
Page 13 and 14:
CONGRESS DATA 1 registrated delegat
Page 16 and 17:
TABLE OF CONTENTS KEYNOTE PAPERS |
Page 18 and 19:
17. TRADITION BASED ON MODERNISM. C
Page 20 and 21:
14. URBAN REPRESENTATION OF STATE P
Page 22 and 23:
11. A CITY BETWEEN METAMORPHOSIS AN
Page 24 and 25:
35. COASTAL ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE C
Page 26:
16. POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES AND PROFES
Page 30 and 31:
Dr VLADIMIR MAKO, Professor Univers
Page 32 and 33:
STEFAN MUTHESIUS, Professor World A
Page 34:
S1 IDEOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF ARCHITECT
Page 37 and 38:
36 Dr MARTA VUKOTIĆ LAZAR PhD Hist
Page 39 and 40:
38 Dr MIODRAG MIŠKO ŠUVAKOVIĆ, P
Page 41 and 42:
40 HARIS DAJČ, PhD student, Teachi
Page 43 and 44:
42 Dr ALEKSANDAR KEKOVIĆ, Assistan
Page 45 and 46:
44 ZVONIMIR KONTREC, PhD student Ba
Page 47 and 48:
46 IVA MARKOVIĆ, PhD student Unive
Page 49 and 50:
48 ANICA TUFEGDŽIĆ, PhD student,
Page 51 and 52:
50 JELENA RISTIĆ TRAJKOVIĆ, PhD s
Page 53 and 54:
52 Dr MARIANN SIMON, Associate Prof
Page 55 and 56:
54 Dr VANA TENTOKALI, Professor Ari
Page 57 and 58: 56 Dr PISANA POSOCCO, Associate Pro
Page 59 and 60: 58 POLINA MIKHNOVA D. Serikbayev Ea
Page 61 and 62: 60 Dr JEAN MARIE CORNEILLE MEUWISSE
Page 63 and 64: 62 MARIJA PAVLOVIĆ MAŠA, PhD stud
Page 66 and 67: M.Sci. PETAR ARSIĆ, Professor Facu
Page 68 and 69: Dr DMITRIJ CHMELNIZKI Berlin, chmel
Page 70 and 71: Dr IRINA KOROBINA Schusev State Mus
Page 72 and 73: Dr ANETA HRISTOVA Faculty of Archit
Page 74 and 75: Dr VLADIMIR MIHAJLOV, Teaching Assi
Page 76 and 77: ANDREJ ŠMID, PhD student Graz Univ
Page 78 and 79: VLADIMIR PAREŽANIN, PhD student, T
Page 80 and 81: ANĐELKA ĆIROVIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 82 and 83: FRANCESCA SALATIN, PhD student Univ
Page 84 and 85: MSc. MEJREMA ZATRIĆ Faculty of Arc
Page 86 and 87: KOSARA KUJUNDŽIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 88 and 89: IVAN STANOJEV, PhD student Faculty
Page 90 and 91: IVA ČUKIĆ, PhD student University
Page 92: S3 MORPHOLOGY AND IDEOLOGICAL PATTE
Page 95 and 96: 94 Dr LJILJANA BLAGOJEVIĆ, Associa
Page 97 and 98: 96 DINA NENCINI, Professor Faculty
Page 99 and 100: 98 TILO AMHOFF, Professor Universit
Page 101 and 102: 100 Dr NENAD RADIĆ, Assistant Prof
Page 103 and 104: 102 PAOLO TOMAZELLA, PhD student Ce
Page 105 and 106: 104 MAJA PLIČANIĆ, PhD student, T
Page 107: 106 CRISTINA PALLINI, Senior resear
Page 111 and 112: 110 NATHALIE‐JOSEPHINE VON MÖLLE
Page 113 and 114: 112 MSc TATJANA BABIĆ, Teaching As
Page 115 and 116: 114 ALEKSANDAR KUŠIĆ PhD student
Page 117 and 118: 116 JACQUELINE MAURER, BA Universit
Page 119 and 120: 118 MILICA VUJOŠEVIĆ, MA Institut
Page 121 and 122: 120 ALEKSANDAR BRKIĆ, PhD student
Page 123 and 124: 122 Dr SUAT ÇABUK, Associate Profe
Page 125 and 126: 124 MONIKA JOVANOVIĆ, PhD student
Page 127 and 128: 126 MILOŠ MIHAJLOVIĆ, PhD student
Page 129 and 130: 128 VLADANA PUTNIK, PhD student Dep
Page 131 and 132: 130 VESNA CAGIĆ MILOŠEVIĆ, Assis
Page 133 and 134: 132 DANICA STOJILJKOVIĆ, PhD stude
Page 136 and 137: JELICA JOVANOVIĆ, architect NGO Gr
Page 138 and 139: PABLO V. FRANKENBERG, M.A. Ludwig
Page 140 and 141: M.Sc. MARINA ĐURĐEVIĆ Museum of
Page 142 and 143: IGOR EKŠTAJN, PhD Student Faculty
Page 144 and 145: Dr MLADEN BURAZOR, Teaching Assista
Page 146 and 147: BRANISLAVA KOVAČEVIĆ, PhD student
Page 148 and 149: RENATA JADREŠIN‐MILIĆ, Teaching
Page 150 and 151: PARASKEVI PANTELIADOU, PhD student
Page 152 and 153: DEJAN ZEC, PhD student, Junior Rese
Page 154 and 155: DANIELA V. DE FREITAS SIMÕES, PhD
Page 156 and 157: LJILJANA MILETIĆ ABRAMOVIĆ, MA Mu
Page 158 and 159:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS|
Page 160 and 161:
1. Abramović Vladimir, PhD student
Page 162 and 163:
91. Muthesius Stefan, Professor 92.
Page 166 and 167:
R a n k o R A D O V I Ć
Page 168 and 169:
Spomen kuća bitke na Sutjesci (Bat
show all

Architecture and Ideology

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?