Architecture and Ideology

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CLAUDIA CELSI, PhD student University “Sapienza” of Rome, PhD school of Architecture and building ‐ space and society, claudia.celsi@gmail.com BIG UNITARY BUILDINGS FOR HOUSING REASONS FOR THE PROJECT OF THE COLLECTIVE SPACE Abstract | Today's necessity to speak about the relationship between architecture and ideology depends on the progressive leaving of the architectural discipline from its necessary operative reasons: the idea and the form. This progressive leaving has provoked that the collective value of the architecture degenerates into a communicative vehicle and into a purely aesthetic result, and has provoked also the degeneration of the individual sphere, which is intended only as a private interest. Such degenerations flow in the fall of the collective sense of the city within the individual and collective sphere necessarily coexist, giving themselves a reason through the identification and the denomination of a selected place and the peculiar values that it communicates. The return of the interest towards the ideology marks the possibility to rejoin the two necessary operative reasons through their mutual neutralization process and to bring the discourse on the architecture as collective art. It condenses the creative act and the reference to permanent and recognizable systems. Ideology as the foundation of the collective character of the architecture also effectively counteracts the dispersion process of the contemporary metropolis, and accepts the real reasons of the settlements. The big unitary buildings for housing are considered as the immediate translation of the contrast between the basic need of living and the basic need of sociality; this contrast takes the limit‐value between urban scale and architectural scale, that fixes three different levels of reading. The first one focuses on the relation of the internal character of the building; the second one investigates the theme of the limit scale of the building compared to the city; the third one considers the building in its complexity, in order to determine an image of “city in the city” or “other city”, or rather as formal representations of ideas aimed at improvement of living. This considerations about the great urban artifact for housing leads to an image – or a meta‐ project that could be considered a representation of an idea about the relationship between collective housing and the city – the urban monastery.. Key words | Big unitary buildings for collective housing; Collective space; Morphology; Project; Representation; Urban monastery 123
124 MONIKA JOVANOVIĆ, PhD student Interdisciplinary studies, University of Arts in Belgrade, monika.z.jovanovic@gmail.com TYPOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF HOUSING AND PUBLIC STRUCTURES DERIVING FROM IDEOLOGY Abstract | In this paper my focus will be on the relation between biopolitics and architecture as well as on the role of architecture in forming national, racial, class, political, behavioural, moral, and family identities and codes. Architecture as an interdisciplinary political social science and practice is determined by relations and synthesis between humanities, technical sciences, designing, building and planning. By developing and acquiring complexity of its own language within historical and geographical societies in which it emerges, architecture is not just an indicator of a certain society’s situation, but one of the primary constituents of its relations and regulations (Pojmovnik teorije umetnosti, Šuvaković, 2011.). Therefore, based on the architectural language of a historical moment, regarding existing or non‐existing typological patterns by which it is made, it is possible to do an analysis of the overall structure of society of that moment. Leaning on the theoretical platform of Michel Foucault (1978.), Hannah Arendt (1958.) and Tamara Đorđević (2010.) I will analyse the typological patterns of the middle class family housing in western Europe throughout the 20th century, towards emerging typological patterns of today with the aim of acknowledging the transformation of the structure of the middle class family and its eventual disappearance. By identifying the present language of architecture of capitalist society in housing typologies I will identify architecture’s biopolitical function in forming contemporary private life and everyday reality. Key words | biopolitics, architecture, housing typology, private life, family identities and codes
Page 2 and 3:
1 International Conference Architec
Page 4:
Organized by Faculty of Architectur
Page 8:
INTRODUCTION The Faculty of Archite
Page 11 and 12:
‐ The rights to housing, work and
Page 13 and 14:
CONGRESS DATA 1 registrated delegat
Page 16 and 17:
TABLE OF CONTENTS KEYNOTE PAPERS |
Page 18 and 19:
17. TRADITION BASED ON MODERNISM. C
Page 20 and 21:
14. URBAN REPRESENTATION OF STATE P
Page 22 and 23:
11. A CITY BETWEEN METAMORPHOSIS AN
Page 24 and 25:
35. COASTAL ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE C
Page 26:
16. POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES AND PROFES
Page 30 and 31:
Dr VLADIMIR MAKO, Professor Univers
Page 32 and 33:
STEFAN MUTHESIUS, Professor World A
Page 34:
S1 IDEOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF ARCHITECT
Page 37 and 38:
36 Dr MARTA VUKOTIĆ LAZAR PhD Hist
Page 39 and 40:
38 Dr MIODRAG MIŠKO ŠUVAKOVIĆ, P
Page 41 and 42:
40 HARIS DAJČ, PhD student, Teachi
Page 43 and 44:
42 Dr ALEKSANDAR KEKOVIĆ, Assistan
Page 45 and 46:
44 ZVONIMIR KONTREC, PhD student Ba
Page 47 and 48:
46 IVA MARKOVIĆ, PhD student Unive
Page 49 and 50:
48 ANICA TUFEGDŽIĆ, PhD student,
Page 51 and 52:
50 JELENA RISTIĆ TRAJKOVIĆ, PhD s
Page 53 and 54:
52 Dr MARIANN SIMON, Associate Prof
Page 55 and 56:
54 Dr VANA TENTOKALI, Professor Ari
Page 57 and 58:
56 Dr PISANA POSOCCO, Associate Pro
Page 59 and 60:
58 POLINA MIKHNOVA D. Serikbayev Ea
Page 61 and 62:
60 Dr JEAN MARIE CORNEILLE MEUWISSE
Page 63 and 64:
62 MARIJA PAVLOVIĆ MAŠA, PhD stud
Page 66 and 67:
M.Sci. PETAR ARSIĆ, Professor Facu
Page 68 and 69:
Dr DMITRIJ CHMELNIZKI Berlin, chmel
Page 70 and 71:
Dr IRINA KOROBINA Schusev State Mus
Page 72 and 73:
Dr ANETA HRISTOVA Faculty of Archit
Page 74 and 75: Dr VLADIMIR MIHAJLOV, Teaching Assi
Page 76 and 77: ANDREJ ŠMID, PhD student Graz Univ
Page 78 and 79: VLADIMIR PAREŽANIN, PhD student, T
Page 80 and 81: ANĐELKA ĆIROVIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 82 and 83: FRANCESCA SALATIN, PhD student Univ
Page 84 and 85: MSc. MEJREMA ZATRIĆ Faculty of Arc
Page 86 and 87: KOSARA KUJUNDŽIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 88 and 89: IVAN STANOJEV, PhD student Faculty
Page 90 and 91: IVA ČUKIĆ, PhD student University
Page 92: S3 MORPHOLOGY AND IDEOLOGICAL PATTE
Page 95 and 96: 94 Dr LJILJANA BLAGOJEVIĆ, Associa
Page 97 and 98: 96 DINA NENCINI, Professor Faculty
Page 99 and 100: 98 TILO AMHOFF, Professor Universit
Page 101 and 102: 100 Dr NENAD RADIĆ, Assistant Prof
Page 103 and 104: 102 PAOLO TOMAZELLA, PhD student Ce
Page 105 and 106: 104 MAJA PLIČANIĆ, PhD student, T
Page 107 and 108: 106 CRISTINA PALLINI, Senior resear
Page 109 and 110: 108 JELENA ŽIVKOVIĆ, Assistant Pr
Page 111 and 112: 110 NATHALIE‐JOSEPHINE VON MÖLLE
Page 113 and 114: 112 MSc TATJANA BABIĆ, Teaching As
Page 115 and 116: 114 ALEKSANDAR KUŠIĆ PhD student
Page 117 and 118: 116 JACQUELINE MAURER, BA Universit
Page 119 and 120: 118 MILICA VUJOŠEVIĆ, MA Institut
Page 121 and 122: 120 ALEKSANDAR BRKIĆ, PhD student
Page 123: 122 Dr SUAT ÇABUK, Associate Profe
Page 127 and 128: 126 MILOŠ MIHAJLOVIĆ, PhD student
Page 129 and 130: 128 VLADANA PUTNIK, PhD student Dep
Page 131 and 132: 130 VESNA CAGIĆ MILOŠEVIĆ, Assis
Page 133 and 134: 132 DANICA STOJILJKOVIĆ, PhD stude
Page 136 and 137: JELICA JOVANOVIĆ, architect NGO Gr
Page 138 and 139: PABLO V. FRANKENBERG, M.A. Ludwig
Page 140 and 141: M.Sc. MARINA ĐURĐEVIĆ Museum of
Page 142 and 143: IGOR EKŠTAJN, PhD Student Faculty
Page 144 and 145: Dr MLADEN BURAZOR, Teaching Assista
Page 146 and 147: BRANISLAVA KOVAČEVIĆ, PhD student
Page 148 and 149: RENATA JADREŠIN‐MILIĆ, Teaching
Page 150 and 151: PARASKEVI PANTELIADOU, PhD student
Page 152 and 153: DEJAN ZEC, PhD student, Junior Rese
Page 154 and 155: DANIELA V. DE FREITAS SIMÕES, PhD
Page 156 and 157: LJILJANA MILETIĆ ABRAMOVIĆ, MA Mu
Page 158 and 159: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS|
Page 160 and 161: 1. Abramović Vladimir, PhD student
Page 162 and 163: 91. Muthesius Stefan, Professor 92.
Page 166 and 167: R a n k o R A D O V I Ć
Page 168 and 169: Spomen kuća bitke na Sutjesci (Bat
show all

Architecture and Ideology

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?