Architecture and Ideology

More documents

Recommendations

Info

M.Sc. MARINA ĐURĐEVIĆ Museum of Science and Technology, Department of Architecture, marinadjurdjevic@yahoo.com THE INFLUENCE OF THE IDEOLOGY AND SPIRIT OF THE TIMES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS OF BROTHERS PETAR AND BRANKO KRSTIC Abstract | The aim of this paper is to show to what extent and in what way the ideology and spirit of the times influenced the development of architectural projects of the Krstic brothers, especially on their buildings for public use, where this influence is the most evident. The paper will discuss how the socio‐political conditions prevailing in Serbia in the period between the world wars, had determined the architectural path of Petar and Branko Krstic. It will also be discussed how the ideological diversity of the time when the Krstics were active had reflected on their designs. One of the issues the paper deals with is the complex relationship between the Krstic brothers and their investors and the way it defined the character of their architectural oeuvre. Namely, the Krstics had to “pay” the realization of their monumental public buildings with concessions to investors, so these works reflect the spirit of the times rather than personal opinion of their authors. These problems will be discussed on the examples of their projects for St. Sava’s Temple, St. Marko’s Church, the Agrarian Bank Palace and the Iguman’s palace. The paper will also present some less known modernist projects of Petar and Branko Krstic that remained unrealized due to the customer’s lack of understanding for the contemporary architectural form, although at the time this style was no longer a rarity in Serbian architecture. It is particularly important to emphasize that a number of the unrealized Krstics’ designs that investors considered too daring, were created before some other anthology examples of Serbian modern architecture between the two world wars. Revelation of such rarely known facts contributes to the more accurate evaluation of the architectural oeuvre of Petar and Branko Krstic and their general contribution to the development of modern architecture in Serbia, which was one of the basic ideas of this paper. Key words | architects Petar and Branko Krstic, ideology, spirit of the times, socio‐political conditions, investors, Serbian inter‐war architecture 139
140 FRANCESCO MENEGATTI, Professor Faculty of Architecture, Politecnico of Milan, francescomenegattipublic@gmail.com THE MILAN GREEN AND HORIZONTAL CITY GIUSEPPE PAGANO. IDEOLOGY BETWEEN DIAGRAM AND PROGRAM Abstract | This paper is intended as a contribution to the reading of the urban plan for the area Sempione Fiera called “The Milan green” and the studies on cities that influenced its reasons and that in turn were influenced by it. Giuseppe Pagano (1986‐1945) is a designer and theorist particularly useful in understanding the complex and contradictory role of ideology in the construction of urban form. His theories are presented in numerous editorials of Casabella –he was fierce critic of the society ‐. His most important works are the “The Milan green” and the “horizontal city”. In 1936 Pagano with Franco Albini, Ignazio Gardella and others, designed the new plan of a Milan district and they called it “The Milan green”. It was a new district included in the city. The principles that guided the urban design were those of the rational city, expressed especially in the work of Ludwig Hilberseimer, and about the housing, the reference were the many projects in Milan the same authors were making. The project of “Horizontal city” (1938) designed for the Brera district is drawn with Diotallevi and Marescotti, and with “The Milan green” was another step in understanding the experimentation that he was taking on the design of the city. Key words | Milan, rationalism, city, Pagano, diagram, program
Page 2 and 3:
1 International Conference Architec
Page 4:
Organized by Faculty of Architectur
Page 8:
INTRODUCTION The Faculty of Archite
Page 11 and 12:
‐ The rights to housing, work and
Page 13 and 14:
CONGRESS DATA 1 registrated delegat
Page 16 and 17:
TABLE OF CONTENTS KEYNOTE PAPERS |
Page 18 and 19:
17. TRADITION BASED ON MODERNISM. C
Page 20 and 21:
14. URBAN REPRESENTATION OF STATE P
Page 22 and 23:
11. A CITY BETWEEN METAMORPHOSIS AN
Page 24 and 25:
35. COASTAL ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE C
Page 26:
16. POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES AND PROFES
Page 30 and 31:
Dr VLADIMIR MAKO, Professor Univers
Page 32 and 33:
STEFAN MUTHESIUS, Professor World A
Page 34:
S1 IDEOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF ARCHITECT
Page 37 and 38:
36 Dr MARTA VUKOTIĆ LAZAR PhD Hist
Page 39 and 40:
38 Dr MIODRAG MIŠKO ŠUVAKOVIĆ, P
Page 41 and 42:
40 HARIS DAJČ, PhD student, Teachi
Page 43 and 44:
42 Dr ALEKSANDAR KEKOVIĆ, Assistan
Page 45 and 46:
44 ZVONIMIR KONTREC, PhD student Ba
Page 47 and 48:
46 IVA MARKOVIĆ, PhD student Unive
Page 49 and 50:
48 ANICA TUFEGDŽIĆ, PhD student,
Page 51 and 52:
50 JELENA RISTIĆ TRAJKOVIĆ, PhD s
Page 53 and 54:
52 Dr MARIANN SIMON, Associate Prof
Page 55 and 56:
54 Dr VANA TENTOKALI, Professor Ari
Page 57 and 58:
56 Dr PISANA POSOCCO, Associate Pro
Page 59 and 60:
58 POLINA MIKHNOVA D. Serikbayev Ea
Page 61 and 62:
60 Dr JEAN MARIE CORNEILLE MEUWISSE
Page 63 and 64:
62 MARIJA PAVLOVIĆ MAŠA, PhD stud
Page 66 and 67:
M.Sci. PETAR ARSIĆ, Professor Facu
Page 68 and 69:
Dr DMITRIJ CHMELNIZKI Berlin, chmel
Page 70 and 71:
Dr IRINA KOROBINA Schusev State Mus
Page 72 and 73:
Dr ANETA HRISTOVA Faculty of Archit
Page 74 and 75:
Dr VLADIMIR MIHAJLOV, Teaching Assi
Page 76 and 77:
ANDREJ ŠMID, PhD student Graz Univ
Page 78 and 79:
VLADIMIR PAREŽANIN, PhD student, T
Page 80 and 81:
ANĐELKA ĆIROVIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 82 and 83:
FRANCESCA SALATIN, PhD student Univ
Page 84 and 85:
MSc. MEJREMA ZATRIĆ Faculty of Arc
Page 86 and 87:
KOSARA KUJUNDŽIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 88 and 89:
IVAN STANOJEV, PhD student Faculty
Page 90 and 91: IVA ČUKIĆ, PhD student University
Page 92: S3 MORPHOLOGY AND IDEOLOGICAL PATTE
Page 95 and 96: 94 Dr LJILJANA BLAGOJEVIĆ, Associa
Page 97 and 98: 96 DINA NENCINI, Professor Faculty
Page 99 and 100: 98 TILO AMHOFF, Professor Universit
Page 101 and 102: 100 Dr NENAD RADIĆ, Assistant Prof
Page 103 and 104: 102 PAOLO TOMAZELLA, PhD student Ce
Page 105 and 106: 104 MAJA PLIČANIĆ, PhD student, T
Page 107 and 108: 106 CRISTINA PALLINI, Senior resear
Page 109 and 110: 108 JELENA ŽIVKOVIĆ, Assistant Pr
Page 111 and 112: 110 NATHALIE‐JOSEPHINE VON MÖLLE
Page 113 and 114: 112 MSc TATJANA BABIĆ, Teaching As
Page 115 and 116: 114 ALEKSANDAR KUŠIĆ PhD student
Page 117 and 118: 116 JACQUELINE MAURER, BA Universit
Page 119 and 120: 118 MILICA VUJOŠEVIĆ, MA Institut
Page 121 and 122: 120 ALEKSANDAR BRKIĆ, PhD student
Page 123 and 124: 122 Dr SUAT ÇABUK, Associate Profe
Page 125 and 126: 124 MONIKA JOVANOVIĆ, PhD student
Page 127 and 128: 126 MILOŠ MIHAJLOVIĆ, PhD student
Page 129 and 130: 128 VLADANA PUTNIK, PhD student Dep
Page 131 and 132: 130 VESNA CAGIĆ MILOŠEVIĆ, Assis
Page 133 and 134: 132 DANICA STOJILJKOVIĆ, PhD stude
Page 136 and 137: JELICA JOVANOVIĆ, architect NGO Gr
Page 138 and 139: PABLO V. FRANKENBERG, M.A. Ludwig
Page 142 and 143: IGOR EKŠTAJN, PhD Student Faculty
Page 144 and 145: Dr MLADEN BURAZOR, Teaching Assista
Page 146 and 147: BRANISLAVA KOVAČEVIĆ, PhD student
Page 148 and 149: RENATA JADREŠIN‐MILIĆ, Teaching
Page 150 and 151: PARASKEVI PANTELIADOU, PhD student
Page 152 and 153: DEJAN ZEC, PhD student, Junior Rese
Page 154 and 155: DANIELA V. DE FREITAS SIMÕES, PhD
Page 156 and 157: LJILJANA MILETIĆ ABRAMOVIĆ, MA Mu
Page 158 and 159: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS|
Page 160 and 161: 1. Abramović Vladimir, PhD student
Page 162 and 163: 91. Muthesius Stefan, Professor 92.
Page 166 and 167: R a n k o R A D O V I Ć
Page 168 and 169: Spomen kuća bitke na Sutjesci (Bat
show all

Architecture and Ideology

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?