Architecture and Ideology

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dr IRINA KOROBINA Schusev State Museum of Architecture, Moscow, Russia NEW MOSCOW 4. IDEOLOGY OF “IDEAL CITY”. Abstract | New MOSCOW 4 The Russian approach to urban planning has always differed radically from the European: the idea of urban development has usually been identified with a quest for ideal forms of organization of urban space and has accordingly tended to express clear and decisive planning intentions. This is especially evident in the history of the development of Moscow in the 20th century. Urban planning in Moscow constantly turns to the idea of foreseeing the future and designing the ideal city. History has predetermined the ideology informing Moscow’s development. Following the October Revolution of 1917 Moscow became the capital of the young Soviet state, taking upon itself the role of ideological centre and laboratory for experiments in the formation of a new society and the quest for new forms of settlement. It was this period that defined the ideal goal as that of building the ‘bright future’, which in its turn determined the direction that would be taken by urban planning over this entire period. The 20th century saw a succession of concepts for building ‘New Moscow’ – whether they were ideas by individual architects or plans developed over years by planning institutions. Historical discourse allows us to identify at least three stages in the development of pre‐ perestroika Moscow, each of which is based on radically different planning approaches aimed at transforming the capital into an ‘ideal city’. New Moscow 1: planning a capital for the world’s first Country of Soviets. New Moscow 2: the ‘General Plan for the Reconstruction and Development of Moscow’ as the model capital of the ‘Empire of Victorious Socialism’ (adopted in 1935). New Moscow 3: the 1971 General Plan for the Reconstruction and Development of Moscow belongs to the period of developed socialism and was based on the idea of total planning. Gorbachev’s perestroika marked the beginning of the collapse of the Soviet system and a rapid switch to a free market in the 1990s. This resulted in a radical transformation of Moscow from the social, economic, territorial, typological, and morphological points of view. The capital continues to function as a gigantic laboratory dedicated to producing New Moscow 4, which has all the marks of an ‘ideal city’. However, the quest for the ‘ideal’ is now more a matter of architectural design than of urban planning. The free market has activated a different concept of the ‘ideal ‘; the ideal is becoming something that is depicted and sometimes openly imitated. Key words | ideal city, ideology, New Moscow, urban planning, architecture, government 69
70 MONICA GONDIM, Professor Professor of Urban Design, Brasília University, monica.gondim@gmail.com, www.monicagondim.com.br URBAN MOBILITY FROM MYTHOLOGY TO CONTEMPORARY TIMES Abstract | This article deals with the representation of mobility in archeological remains, mythological narratives and architectural literature. The research suggests that this collection of human history shows the formation of the archetypes of mobility that, over time, shaped the cities according to their preference for movement or for permanence. Key words | mobility, morphology, history, archaelogy, mythology, Bible
Page 2 and 3:
1 International Conference Architec
Page 4:
Organized by Faculty of Architectur
Page 8:
INTRODUCTION The Faculty of Archite
Page 11 and 12:
‐ The rights to housing, work and
Page 13 and 14:
CONGRESS DATA 1 registrated delegat
Page 16 and 17:
TABLE OF CONTENTS KEYNOTE PAPERS |
Page 18 and 19:
17. TRADITION BASED ON MODERNISM. C
Page 20 and 21: 14. URBAN REPRESENTATION OF STATE P
Page 22 and 23: 11. A CITY BETWEEN METAMORPHOSIS AN
Page 24 and 25: 35. COASTAL ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE C
Page 26: 16. POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES AND PROFES
Page 30 and 31: Dr VLADIMIR MAKO, Professor Univers
Page 32 and 33: STEFAN MUTHESIUS, Professor World A
Page 34: S1 IDEOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF ARCHITECT
Page 37 and 38: 36 Dr MARTA VUKOTIĆ LAZAR PhD Hist
Page 39 and 40: 38 Dr MIODRAG MIŠKO ŠUVAKOVIĆ, P
Page 41 and 42: 40 HARIS DAJČ, PhD student, Teachi
Page 43 and 44: 42 Dr ALEKSANDAR KEKOVIĆ, Assistan
Page 45 and 46: 44 ZVONIMIR KONTREC, PhD student Ba
Page 47 and 48: 46 IVA MARKOVIĆ, PhD student Unive
Page 49 and 50: 48 ANICA TUFEGDŽIĆ, PhD student,
Page 51 and 52: 50 JELENA RISTIĆ TRAJKOVIĆ, PhD s
Page 53 and 54: 52 Dr MARIANN SIMON, Associate Prof
Page 55 and 56: 54 Dr VANA TENTOKALI, Professor Ari
Page 57 and 58: 56 Dr PISANA POSOCCO, Associate Pro
Page 59 and 60: 58 POLINA MIKHNOVA D. Serikbayev Ea
Page 61 and 62: 60 Dr JEAN MARIE CORNEILLE MEUWISSE
Page 63 and 64: 62 MARIJA PAVLOVIĆ MAŠA, PhD stud
Page 66 and 67: M.Sci. PETAR ARSIĆ, Professor Facu
Page 68 and 69: Dr DMITRIJ CHMELNIZKI Berlin, chmel
Page 72 and 73: Dr ANETA HRISTOVA Faculty of Archit
Page 74 and 75: Dr VLADIMIR MIHAJLOV, Teaching Assi
Page 76 and 77: ANDREJ ŠMID, PhD student Graz Univ
Page 78 and 79: VLADIMIR PAREŽANIN, PhD student, T
Page 80 and 81: ANĐELKA ĆIROVIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 82 and 83: FRANCESCA SALATIN, PhD student Univ
Page 84 and 85: MSc. MEJREMA ZATRIĆ Faculty of Arc
Page 86 and 87: KOSARA KUJUNDŽIĆ, PhD student, Te
Page 88 and 89: IVAN STANOJEV, PhD student Faculty
Page 90 and 91: IVA ČUKIĆ, PhD student University
Page 92: S3 MORPHOLOGY AND IDEOLOGICAL PATTE
Page 95 and 96: 94 Dr LJILJANA BLAGOJEVIĆ, Associa
Page 97 and 98: 96 DINA NENCINI, Professor Faculty
Page 99 and 100: 98 TILO AMHOFF, Professor Universit
Page 101 and 102: 100 Dr NENAD RADIĆ, Assistant Prof
Page 103 and 104: 102 PAOLO TOMAZELLA, PhD student Ce
Page 105 and 106: 104 MAJA PLIČANIĆ, PhD student, T
Page 107 and 108: 106 CRISTINA PALLINI, Senior resear
Page 109 and 110: 108 JELENA ŽIVKOVIĆ, Assistant Pr
Page 111 and 112: 110 NATHALIE‐JOSEPHINE VON MÖLLE
Page 113 and 114: 112 MSc TATJANA BABIĆ, Teaching As
Page 115 and 116: 114 ALEKSANDAR KUŠIĆ PhD student
Page 117 and 118: 116 JACQUELINE MAURER, BA Universit
Page 119 and 120: 118 MILICA VUJOŠEVIĆ, MA Institut
Page 121 and 122:
120 ALEKSANDAR BRKIĆ, PhD student
Page 123 and 124:
122 Dr SUAT ÇABUK, Associate Profe
Page 125 and 126:
124 MONIKA JOVANOVIĆ, PhD student
Page 127 and 128:
126 MILOŠ MIHAJLOVIĆ, PhD student
Page 129 and 130:
128 VLADANA PUTNIK, PhD student Dep
Page 131 and 132:
130 VESNA CAGIĆ MILOŠEVIĆ, Assis
Page 133 and 134:
132 DANICA STOJILJKOVIĆ, PhD stude
Page 136 and 137:
JELICA JOVANOVIĆ, architect NGO Gr
Page 138 and 139:
PABLO V. FRANKENBERG, M.A. Ludwig
Page 140 and 141:
M.Sc. MARINA ĐURĐEVIĆ Museum of
Page 142 and 143:
IGOR EKŠTAJN, PhD Student Faculty
Page 144 and 145:
Dr MLADEN BURAZOR, Teaching Assista
Page 146 and 147:
BRANISLAVA KOVAČEVIĆ, PhD student
Page 148 and 149:
RENATA JADREŠIN‐MILIĆ, Teaching
Page 150 and 151:
PARASKEVI PANTELIADOU, PhD student
Page 152 and 153:
DEJAN ZEC, PhD student, Junior Rese
Page 154 and 155:
DANIELA V. DE FREITAS SIMÕES, PhD
Page 156 and 157:
LJILJANA MILETIĆ ABRAMOVIĆ, MA Mu
Page 158 and 159:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS|
Page 160 and 161:
1. Abramović Vladimir, PhD student
Page 162 and 163:
91. Muthesius Stefan, Professor 92.
Page 166 and 167:
R a n k o R A D O V I Ć
Page 168 and 169:
Spomen kuća bitke na Sutjesci (Bat
show all

Architecture and Ideology

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?