EUROMAINTENANCE JOURNAL - DNV Germany
EUROMAINTENANCE JOURNAL - DNV Germany
EUROMAINTENANCE JOURNAL - DNV Germany
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HIGHLIGHTS<br />
SHUTDOWNS – TURNAROUNDS - OUTAGES<br />
READINESS REVIEW TO IDENTIFY AREAS<br />
OF RISK FOR TURNAROUND<br />
“The evaluation of turnaround preparations in order to reveal the<br />
differences between the current status of the work preparation process in<br />
comparison to PDM Best Practices”. This is the objective of the readiness<br />
reviews conducted by PDM during the preparation phase of planned,<br />
complex turnarounds with various renowned enterprises. Only in this<br />
way, we are able to identify risk areas for turnarounds may at an early<br />
stage. Recently, PDM conducted such a review for a major refi nery in<br />
Europe, that will be facing a substantial turnaround in 2008.<br />
Thanks to our many years of experience<br />
in this fi eld, some time ago,<br />
we received the order to conduct a<br />
readiness review for a famous refi nery<br />
in Europe, in preparation for a substantial<br />
turnaround in 2008. No less than<br />
1.3 million man hours were budgeted<br />
for the operation. It entailed performing<br />
maintenance and inspections as well as<br />
the realisation of improvement projects<br />
(including plant changes),” says Bas<br />
Broods, consultant with PDM.<br />
Approach<br />
Broods: “Upon the client’s request and together<br />
with the client’s peer-review team,<br />
we participated in a readiness review in<br />
May 2007 to identify potential risk areas<br />
in the preparatory phase for the prospec-<br />
tive turnaround. Moreover, we were invited<br />
to make short-term and long-term<br />
recommendations. The short-term recommendations<br />
are aimed at the prospective<br />
turnaround. The long-term recommendations<br />
relate to future turnarounds.<br />
Readiness reviews<br />
The bulk of the readiness review consisted<br />
of interviews held in conformity<br />
with the PDM readiness review system.<br />
These interviews were staged with the<br />
representatives of the various disciplines<br />
involved in the turnaround-organisation,<br />
such as planning, scheduling, cost control,<br />
engineering, maintenance and operations.<br />
Broods: “Based on the results<br />
of these interviews and PDM best practices,<br />
our consultants identifi ed the realistic<br />
risks for which corrective actions will be<br />
required. They presented their fi ndings<br />
and recommendations to the turnaround<br />
management team”.<br />
Reports<br />
Subsequently, we compiled the concluding<br />
report in close consultation with the<br />
PDM Turnaround Expert. The report contained<br />
all of the fi ndings as well as the<br />
short-term and long-term recommendations.<br />
The concluding report was submitted<br />
to the client’s peer-review team.<br />
Broods: “All in all, we may conclude that<br />
we have succeeded to identify all possible<br />
risk areas for the planned, substantial<br />
turnaround of 2008. This success was<br />
achieved thanks to the excellent cooperation<br />
between the client’s peer review<br />
team and PDM. Our report enables the<br />
client to take all of the necessary preventative<br />
measures on time. By doing so,<br />
he will reduce the risks to a minimum.<br />
All of this will result in a more optimal<br />
work preparation and execution of the<br />
turnaround”.<br />
The BASF Steamcracker<br />
turnaround<br />
Safety risks, maintenance costs, downtime<br />
losses. These three aspects must be<br />
closely monitored in case of a shutdown,<br />
since they have an immediate effect on<br />
the annual results and on the company’s<br />
image. A detailed project approach is vital<br />
if expansion projects must be carried<br />
out in addition to a ‘normal’ shutdown.<br />
Kris Bakelants, Technical Manager with<br />
Profs for Industry: “The assignment of<br />
BASF was to increase system capacity<br />
by 35%”. All of the required changes<br />
had to be carried out by the engineering<br />
fi rm who had constructed the system 14<br />
years ago. The assignment was substantial<br />
and complex. Also the production<br />
staff with all of their daily duties were<br />
not able to assist punching and precommissioning<br />
activities. Bakelants: “So our<br />
organisation was invited to offer support<br />
in this respect. Our support consisted of<br />
taking and punching new line systems,<br />
the creation of a general punch list as<br />
Euromaintenance Journal, January 2008<br />
9