MOUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland
MOUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland
MOUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F.x. RYAN<br />
ing a consul who would hold <strong>of</strong>fice for eleven hours.<br />
If the priestly comitia were part <strong>of</strong> the elections for 44. it would not<br />
be easy to gauge the month in which the pontiffs were elected. We do<br />
not know whether some <strong>of</strong> the quaestors for 44 had been elected before<br />
the last day <strong>of</strong> 45; with forty places to fill. the quaestorian comitia<br />
by themselves might have consumed several days. The election <strong>of</strong> curule<br />
aediles preceded that <strong>of</strong> quaestors. the election <strong>of</strong> praetors preceded<br />
that <strong>of</strong> curule aediles. the election <strong>of</strong> consuls preceded that <strong>of</strong><br />
praetors. and the election <strong>of</strong> priests preceded that <strong>of</strong> consuls. In short.<br />
if Nero was elected during the comitia held to elect the popular magistrates<br />
<strong>of</strong> 44. he might have gained his victory in November 45 rather<br />
than December 45; it seems likely. however. that the month <strong>of</strong> October<br />
was largely devoted to electing the popular magistrates <strong>of</strong> 45.<br />
Nor would it be easy to choose between the two alternatives and assign<br />
the sacerdotal comitia either to the comitia held to elect the magistrates<br />
<strong>of</strong> 45 or to the comitia held to elect magistrates for 44. 14 In favor<br />
<strong>of</strong> the former alternative one might argue that the delay in electing a<br />
successor to Scipio was already unconscionably long at twenty<br />
months. ls and that the Romans would not have further postponed the<br />
election <strong>of</strong> a successor; to this the obvious rejoinder is that the next<br />
round <strong>of</strong> elections was not a full year in the future but only a month<br />
or so in the future. and that a further delay <strong>of</strong> a month or two was not<br />
a significant addition to the previous delay <strong>of</strong> twenty months. In favor<br />
<strong>of</strong> the latter alternative one might argue that the Romans would not<br />
have wanted to defer the election <strong>of</strong> popular magistrates for 45 by attaching<br />
the sacerdotal comitia to those elections. since the year 45 was<br />
rapidly vanishing. This seems a rather strong argument when one<br />
remembers that the sacerdotal comitia preceded the consular and so<br />
would delay the elections to all popular magistracies. when one remembers<br />
that nearly twice the usual number <strong>of</strong> praetors and exactly<br />
twice the usual number <strong>of</strong> quaestors were elected for 45. and when<br />
one remembers that these elections probably got underway in mid<br />
October. seven weeks or so before the end <strong>of</strong> the quaestorian year.<br />
14 Although in normal circumstances priestly candidates were nominated at a<br />
contio and the sacerdotal comitia could occur no sooner than a trinundinum after<br />
the nominations. in the case <strong>of</strong> delayed elections we may assume that the trinundinum-requirement<br />
was suspended. a. J. Linderski (above. n. 5). "Cicero's election<br />
to the augurate" 194 n. 55.196 n. 63 =Roman Questions 244 n. 55.246 n. 63· In other<br />
words. it would not be proper to adduce the trinundinum-requirement as a reason<br />
for associating the priestly elections with the comitia for 44·<br />
15 Between the death <strong>of</strong> Scipio in April 46 and the elections in October 45<br />
twenty months elapsed rather than eighteen. since two months were intercalated<br />
between November and December 46 (Suet. Jul. 40.2).