11.01.2013 Views

Chandigarh Ahmedabad – Le Corbusier - Vereniging van ...

Chandigarh Ahmedabad – Le Corbusier - Vereniging van ...

Chandigarh Ahmedabad – Le Corbusier - Vereniging van ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

detrimental to their own well-being.<br />

Over the years, the <strong>Chandigarh</strong> Administration has been tackling the problem of squatter settlements. Since<br />

1975, the chandigarh Housing Board has taken up schemes which have resettled 14,619 families. Low-cost<br />

housing has been created for many thousands of people. Initially, the <strong>Chandigarh</strong> Housing Board constructed<br />

resettlement colonies consisting of one-room tenements The most recent approach has been to mark out<br />

plinth areas on developed land (in situ resettlement) and allow the people to create their own homes. The<br />

Ambedkar Awas Yojana is also being implemented in <strong>Chandigarh</strong>. This scheme provides funds to the<br />

<strong>Chandigarh</strong> Housing Board which constructs one-room dwellings and allots them to Scheduled Caste and<br />

Backward Class persons. The Administration's plans are targeted at some 20,000 families living in huts.<br />

The Administration's resettlement schemes have attracted criticism on the grounds that, by their liberality, they<br />

have attracted squatters to the city. It is alleged that a man comes and builds his hut on the periphery of the<br />

city because he knows there is a very good chance that the Administration will resettle him in better conditions<br />

-- perhaps in a clean, dry, cement-roofed house with electricity and running water -- and then, if he is in dire<br />

need of money, he can sell this better house, use the cash, build another hut and wait for the next<br />

resettlement scheme. Against this, it is argued that such squatter population of persons who cannot afford to<br />

own urban property (even , in some cases, if it is given to them) is inevitably a part of the urban population of<br />

all major cities; that resettlement, including in situ resettlement, can improve the quality of urban life despite<br />

the criticism made.<br />

The last census of persons residing in squatter settlements was conducted in 1991. At that time 9.08 per cent<br />

of the city's population lived in huts. (19,210 huts at that time and a total population of 96,050) The percentage<br />

has probably grown much higher over the past six years. Professor Gopal Krishan, who conducted the survey<br />

estimated that but for the Administration's rehabilitation schemes the percentage would have been about 18<br />

per cent. Krishan projects a squatter population of nearly 13 per cent by the year 2000, rising to 17.25 per<br />

cent in 2010 and 21.55 per cent by 2020. His projection may have been optimistic, and the squatter population<br />

of <strong>Chandigarh</strong> may already by close to the national average of 21 per cent of urban population. The search for<br />

a humane, and affordable and cheat-proof, solution to the problem of labour colonies grows more urgent.<br />

Several villages were allowed to remain in the southern area of the city. As development of the sectors has<br />

progressed, these villages have been engulfed by the city. The villages are exempted from architectural and<br />

sanitation controls. The sectors are a ready market for milk with the result that the cattle population of these<br />

villages has grown although the villages have no grazing land left, nor any space for keeping cowdung or<br />

cattle-feed. Many of the original inhabitants have divided and redivided the compounds of their homes and<br />

rented out to labourers. Population density in these villages is now extremely high, while water, electricity,<br />

sanitation and other services for this population remain grossly inadequate. In some village areas one also<br />

sees a boom in construction of commercial premises. In the absence of strict regulation, many of these new<br />

buildings may be highly unsafe. In short, the "engulfed villages" constitute a problem -- or possibly an<br />

opportunity to add traditional flavour to the rigid recipe of <strong>Le</strong> <strong>Corbusier</strong>'s <strong>Chandigarh</strong>. One of the most<br />

fashionable areas in Delhi is one such "engulfed village" -- preserved in all its traditional charm but made<br />

clean and inviting to both shoppers and tourists. It has been suggested that a similar role might be found for<br />

<strong>Chandigarh</strong>'s villages though the issue is open to debate.<br />

CHANGES IN LAND USE<br />

Labourers are not the only people who put areas to unauthorised use. Many people residing in the sectors<br />

have knocked down back walls and created small shops in a portion of their homes. Land use is informally<br />

changed from residential to semi-commercial. This has its effect on services, quality of life, the city's economy<br />

and land prices.<br />

City planners know that as towns evolve there is a tendency for land use to change from predominantly<br />

residential to predominantly commercial. In severe forms this is "inner city decay" with all its attendant ills of<br />

congestion, neglect, high crime rate, falling property values and so on. Some planners suggest that<br />

<strong>Chandigarh</strong> might permit mixed land use with strict conditions on parking and unauthorised construction<br />

thereafter.<br />

Even in purely residential neighborhoods, one may see an increase in population density as the grandchildren<br />

and great grandchildren of original occupants demand space for their families on the same property. At<br />

present the law prohibits sub-division of plots but families may find a way to get around this. They may rebuild<br />

or remodel existing homes so as to create flats, thereby increasing population density.<br />

21 / 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!