- Page 1 and 2: ENERGIZING INNOVATION IN INTEGRATED
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures i
- Page 5 and 6: 9.5 Case Study Interview Template 1
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 18a: (Case Study Projects) I
- Page 9 and 10: LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Case Study
- Page 11 and 12: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Innovation is a t
- Page 13 and 14: Diffusion Many innovative solutions
- Page 15 and 16: This perspective often stems in par
- Page 17 and 18: Task 2: Investigate Current Innovat
- Page 19 and 20: presentation that describes the res
- Page 21 and 22: “Application of technology that i
- Page 23 and 24: innovation process and have develop
- Page 25 and 26: adopters are those who are typicall
- Page 27 and 28: innovation is initiated when soluti
- Page 29 and 30: efficient” (ENR 2006). This recog
- Page 31 and 32: 2.5 Barriers to Innovation There ar
- Page 33 and 34: Christensen’s statement of disrup
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 5. Life Cycle Cost Savings T
- Page 37 and 38: 2. It’s proven that change works.
- Page 39 and 40: 3.0 RESEARCH METHODS This section o
- Page 41 and 42: questionnaire solicited information
- Page 43 and 44: projects was created. The 20 projec
- Page 45: 4.0 RESULTS 4.1 Respondent Demograp
- Page 49 and 50: Table 1. Case Study Demographics Pr
- Page 51 and 52: asked specifically about those inno
- Page 53 and 54: % listed as significant or higher m
- Page 55 and 56: cited are: sufficient time and reso
- Page 57 and 58: • Design-bid-build project delive
- Page 59 and 60: Cost Productivity Quality Competiti
- Page 61 and 62: and budget analyses (64%). Safety p
- Page 63 and 64: 5.0 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION Analyse
- Page 65 and 66: innovation. The innovation scores r
- Page 67 and 68: • How would you rate the level of
- Page 69 and 70: Innovation Score 70 60 50 40 30 20
- Page 71 and 72: Innovation Score 70 60 50 40 30 20
- Page 73 and 74: 5.2.4 Degree of Project Team Integr
- Page 75 and 76: Innovation Score 70 60 50 40 30 20
- Page 77 and 78: Innovation Score 70 60 50 40 30 20
- Page 79 and 80: engineering and construction firms
- Page 81 and 82: Innovation Score 70 60 50 40 30 20
- Page 83 and 84: A similar process was used to corre
- Page 85 and 86: Innovation Score 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6
- Page 87 and 88: A similar process was used to analy
- Page 89 and 90: Innovation Score 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6
- Page 91 and 92: Innovation Score (Average of all pr
- Page 93 and 94: Innovation Score (Average of all pr
- Page 95 and 96: Innovation Score 70 60 50 40 30 20
- Page 97 and 98:
In addition to identifying leading
- Page 99 and 100:
The input provided by the industry
- Page 101 and 102:
The ratings given by the validation
- Page 103 and 104:
and within budget is also a motivat
- Page 105 and 106:
6.2 Recommendations The barriers id
- Page 107 and 108:
esearch would involve assessing the
- Page 109 and 110:
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PRODUCTS AND DIF
- Page 111 and 112:
8.0 REFERENCES Abd El Halim, O. and
- Page 113 and 114:
Thorpe, A., Eds., Centre for Innova
- Page 115 and 116:
Department of Civil, Construction a
- Page 117 and 118:
Transportation Commercial/Office Bu
- Page 119 and 120:
Owner/client Program Manager Genera
- Page 121 and 122:
Lack of communication Lack of perso
- Page 123 and 124:
Moderate High Very high Don’t kno
- Page 125 and 126:
No If yes, and to receive a summary
- Page 127 and 128:
Dear : OSU Construction Engineering
- Page 129 and 130:
The Organization 5.) Types of servi
- Page 131 and 132:
14.) What was the resource investme
- Page 133 and 134:
Low return on investment Lack of co
- Page 135 and 136:
Competitive advantage Marketing Oth
- Page 137 and 138:
Email Address: Phone Number: Please
- Page 139 and 140:
39 Online Contractor Badging 2005 N
- Page 141 and 142:
133 Military Tank Proof Load Testin
- Page 143 and 144:
227 Bridge Lock-up Device System 20
- Page 145 and 146:
15 Baltimore, MD 2003-05 Art Museum
- Page 147 and 148:
Project Scope (difficulty of work/u
- Page 149 and 150:
9.6 Validation Cover Letter and Que
- Page 151 and 152:
Thank you for providing your insigh
- Page 153 and 154:
Please rate the impact of the follo
- Page 155 and 156:
program Communication among firms C
- Page 157 and 158:
9.8 Case Study Summaries The follow
- Page 159 and 160:
The interviewees identified the fol
- Page 161 and 162:
Barriers to Innovation Project comm
- Page 163 and 164:
Innovation was linked to improvemen
- Page 165 and 166:
Enablers for Innovation The followi
- Page 167 and 168:
Outcomes of Innovation Since there
- Page 169 and 170:
Enablers for Innovation The followi
- Page 171 and 172:
Not applicable given the lack of in
- Page 173 and 174:
In addition to being able to demoli
- Page 175 and 176:
• Unilateral communication • La
- Page 177:
Outcomes of Innovation No outcomes