3.3_Case update by Benita Whitcher.pdf
3.3_Case update by Benita Whitcher.pdf
3.3_Case update by Benita Whitcher.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S189A retrenchments<br />
CContinental ti t l Tyres T SA (Pty) (Pt ) Ltd v NUMSA [2008] 9 BLLR 828 (LAC)<br />
• Where consultation ito s 189 had almost reached its conclusion and there had<br />
been no challenge to the substantive reasons for the retrenchment, the ER is not<br />
obliged to halt this retrenchment process and include the workers affected<br />
therein in a section 189A process that unexpectedly arises.<br />
More so, if the ER had not reached the stage of<br />
‘contemplating’ retrenchments when it issued the s 189A<br />
notice.<br />
In these circumstances the ER was not denying the prior<br />
In these circumstances the ER was not denying the prior<br />
affected workers their rights under s 189A, including the right<br />
to strike.