3.3_Case update by Benita Whitcher.pdf
3.3_Case update by Benita Whitcher.pdf
3.3_Case update by Benita Whitcher.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Rights and interests disputes<br />
NPA & others v PSA & others [209] 4 BLLR 362 (LC)<br />
– Facts: ito the Public Service Regulations of 2001, posts in the NPA were<br />
upgraded. However, the regs provided that salary increases for upgraded<br />
posts could only be granted if the department had funds for the increases,<br />
which the NPA did not have and the Treasury refused to give funds.<br />
– What was to happen once the job grading process was completed was that<br />
those EEs whose jobs were upgraded would be entitled to a wage increase.<br />
– This brought g into the dispute p a major j component p of a rights g dispute p because<br />
the legislation provided a legal impediment to the demand.<br />
– Thus disputes in which EEs seek to create fresh rights [in this case a wage<br />
i increase] ] are not t necessarily il interest i t t disputes.<br />
di t
Change language