16.01.2013 Views

Peace Project Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

Peace Project Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

Peace Project Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Peace</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Annual Report: 2010<br />

5.1.17.3 Status<br />

on lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and kokanee (Blackman et al. 1990;<br />

Stewart et al. 2007). Grayling, and mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), have<br />

suffered drastic population declines since the early 1980’s when stocks were<br />

reported healthy in the reservoir and its tributaries (Northcote 2000; Blackman 2001).<br />

Grayling now appear to be restricted to a small number of watersheds above the<br />

W.A.C. Bennett and <strong>Peace</strong> Canyon Dams and are estimated to be less than 1% of<br />

their original population (McPhail 2007). As a result, the grayling (population 1) is<br />

red-listed in <strong>BC</strong> (B.C. Minist. of Environ. Victoria 2009) and requires considerable<br />

attention to support recovery of the population. Arctic grayling depend on the lower<br />

reaches of larger mainstem rivers or the reservoir embayments that these<br />

watercourses empty into for adult rearing habitat (Clarke et al. 2007; McPhail 2007).<br />

The <strong>Peace</strong>/Williston Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program (PWFWCP) has<br />

collected a large body of data relevant to the perceived tributary access impacts to<br />

native fishes linked to reservoir development since the program inception in 1988<br />

and a significant amount of resources have been expended to develop potential<br />

compensation solutions since the creation of the reservoir, but as of yet little work<br />

has been done implementing previously proposed mitigation recommendations<br />

(Langston 1992; Fielden et al. 1993; Langston and Blackman 1993; Morgan 1995;<br />

Aquatic Resources Limited 2002).<br />

This report attempts to reconcile previous recommendations with a practical and<br />

thoughtful approach to designing an experimental trial using proven mitigation and<br />

restoration techniques to improve fish access to affected tributary systems. Although<br />

we are not aware of any previous examples of similar remediation projects<br />

implemented in reservoirs elsewhere, the designs we recommend have been<br />

successfully implemented in many stream mitigation and restoration projects and<br />

follow recognized hydrologic design principles (Newbury and Gaboury 1993).<br />

Specifically, our objectives are to improve or restore fish access to fluvial habitats<br />

isolated by LWD accrual and /or drawdown effects resultant from normal reservoir<br />

operation, with a focus on increasing access to available habitat of listed and<br />

regionally significant fish. This report discusses:<br />

� Inventory and ranking of candidate tributary sites<br />

� Biophysical description of 2 sites recommended for trial mitigation<br />

� Conceptual design recommendations for mitigation works to restore access<br />

and improve fish habitat at tributary mouths by rehabilitating channel<br />

characteristics at elevations between the low and high water levels:<br />

� Management / maintenance plan for physical works<br />

� Cost estimate for proposed physical works<br />

This project is complete.<br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> Page 44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!