You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Peace</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Annual Report: 2010<br />
5.1.17.3 Status<br />
on lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and kokanee (Blackman et al. 1990;<br />
Stewart et al. 2007). Grayling, and mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), have<br />
suffered drastic population declines since the early 1980’s when stocks were<br />
reported healthy in the reservoir and its tributaries (Northcote 2000; Blackman 2001).<br />
Grayling now appear to be restricted to a small number of watersheds above the<br />
W.A.C. Bennett and <strong>Peace</strong> Canyon Dams and are estimated to be less than 1% of<br />
their original population (McPhail 2007). As a result, the grayling (population 1) is<br />
red-listed in <strong>BC</strong> (B.C. Minist. of Environ. Victoria 2009) and requires considerable<br />
attention to support recovery of the population. Arctic grayling depend on the lower<br />
reaches of larger mainstem rivers or the reservoir embayments that these<br />
watercourses empty into for adult rearing habitat (Clarke et al. 2007; McPhail 2007).<br />
The <strong>Peace</strong>/Williston Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program (PWFWCP) has<br />
collected a large body of data relevant to the perceived tributary access impacts to<br />
native fishes linked to reservoir development since the program inception in 1988<br />
and a significant amount of resources have been expended to develop potential<br />
compensation solutions since the creation of the reservoir, but as of yet little work<br />
has been done implementing previously proposed mitigation recommendations<br />
(Langston 1992; Fielden et al. 1993; Langston and Blackman 1993; Morgan 1995;<br />
Aquatic Resources Limited 2002).<br />
This report attempts to reconcile previous recommendations with a practical and<br />
thoughtful approach to designing an experimental trial using proven mitigation and<br />
restoration techniques to improve fish access to affected tributary systems. Although<br />
we are not aware of any previous examples of similar remediation projects<br />
implemented in reservoirs elsewhere, the designs we recommend have been<br />
successfully implemented in many stream mitigation and restoration projects and<br />
follow recognized hydrologic design principles (Newbury and Gaboury 1993).<br />
Specifically, our objectives are to improve or restore fish access to fluvial habitats<br />
isolated by LWD accrual and /or drawdown effects resultant from normal reservoir<br />
operation, with a focus on increasing access to available habitat of listed and<br />
regionally significant fish. This report discusses:<br />
� Inventory and ranking of candidate tributary sites<br />
� Biophysical description of 2 sites recommended for trial mitigation<br />
� Conceptual design recommendations for mitigation works to restore access<br />
and improve fish habitat at tributary mouths by rehabilitating channel<br />
characteristics at elevations between the low and high water levels:<br />
� Management / maintenance plan for physical works<br />
� Cost estimate for proposed physical works<br />
This project is complete.<br />
<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> Page 44