Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Lower Jones Creek ... - BC Hydro
Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Lower Jones Creek ... - BC Hydro
Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Lower Jones Creek ... - BC Hydro
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Equation 2: Peterson's formula for limits of R<br />
R �1. 92 �1.<br />
96 ( R �1)<br />
3.6 Flow and Environmental Monitoring<br />
Flows in <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> were monitored at an established transect near the <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong><br />
remote hydrometric station located 40 m downstream of the Laidlaw Bridge (Figure 2). Daily<br />
flows in the creek were measured using a swoffer flow metre and top-set wading rod since data<br />
from the hydrometric station was not available during the spring out-migration period. To<br />
measure flows, a measuring tape was strung perpendicular to the flow at the location noted<br />
above. Depth and velocity was measured at 0.5 m intervals which resulted in approximately 27<br />
measurements across the channel. Depths were measured to the nearest centimeter with the<br />
top-set wading rod and a velocity measurement was taken at the same location using. Depth of<br />
the velocity measurement was set by the 60% scale on the top-set wading rod.<br />
Temperature was monitored using 2 TidBit temperature loggers, one placed downstream of the<br />
hydrometric station in <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> and the other in Lorenzetti <strong>Creek</strong> (Figure 2). Logger<br />
depth was approximately 0.5 m at each location although depth varied with river stage. Loggers<br />
were set to measure temperature at hourly intervals. Currently, there is no quality assurance<br />
procedure to measure instrument drift with the Onset temperature loggers. Accumulated<br />
Thermal Units (ATUs) were calculated using the cumulative total of the mean daily temperature.<br />
The ATUs were used to track emergence timing estimates and length of incubation between<br />
species.<br />
Photos were taken over the course of the trap operation documenting any changes in stream<br />
channel morphology that might occur.<br />
4. Results<br />
4.1 Chum Salmon Escapement<br />
The first observation of chum salmon was on September 22, 2008 when 7 chum were<br />
observed (Figure 3, Table 2). Numbers increased throughout the first week in October until the<br />
peak count on October 6, 2008 when a total of 132 chum were observed. Two chum were<br />
observed in <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> on November 18, 2008 and none were observed on<br />
subsequent surveys. Carcass recovery was completed during each of the field surveys.<br />
Excluding Lorenzetta, a total of 66 carcasses were recovered. The peak carcass count of 20<br />
occurred on October 6, 2008. Lorenzetta <strong>Creek</strong> was not fully accessible to chum until October<br />
1, 2008. The peak count in Lorenzetta was 14 adults on October 8, 2008.<br />
<strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> Fish Productivity Monitoring 2008-2009 10