16.01.2013 Views

Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Lower Jones Creek ... - BC Hydro

Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Lower Jones Creek ... - BC Hydro

Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Lower Jones Creek ... - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 6.Species composition of fish captured in the <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> trap 2009.<br />

Common Name<br />

Salmonids<br />

Taxonomic Name Total Catch % Composition<br />

Chum Salmon Oncorhynchus keta 231 95.5%<br />

Rainbow Trout<br />

Non-salmonids<br />

Salmo mykiss 2 0.8%<br />

Sculpins Cottus (sp) 8 3.3%<br />

Longnose Dace Rhinichthys cataractae 1 0.4%<br />

Total 242<br />

Chum fry were captured on 30 of the 54 trapping days for a total of 231 fry. The first chum fry<br />

was captured on March 28 and the last was captured on May 7, 2009. The peak single day<br />

catch for chum fry occurred on April 25 when 30 were captured, (Figure 7). Out-migration<br />

timing dates for chum fry were 10% by April 11, 50% by April 25, and 90% by May 5. The<br />

number of out-migrating chum fry captured in 2009 was the second largest amount since<br />

surveys began in 1999 (Table 12).<br />

Daily chum Fry Capture .<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Chum Fry<br />

Discharge<br />

22-Mar 29-Mar 5-Apr 12-Apr 19-Apr 26-Apr 3-May 10-May<br />

Figure 7.Illustration of chum fry daily capture and <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> discharge. Mark-recapture<br />

tests are highlighted in green at the flow recorded during release.<br />

A total of five mark-recapture tests were carried out on lower <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> throughout the<br />

migration period. Mark-recaptures were performed at early, peak and late out-migration timing<br />

and at a variety of flows. The first two tests were carried out in the single trap configuration and<br />

had capture efficiencies of 0.113 and 0.065 respectively (Table 7). The final three tests were<br />

done in the dual trap configuration and had a much higher capture efficiency (0.565, 0.336, and<br />

0.193 respectively).<br />

<strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> Fish Productivity Monitoring 2008-2009 18<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Discharge cms

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!