2010 RWISO Journal - Roth Williams International Society of ...
2010 RWISO Journal - Roth Williams International Society of ...
2010 RWISO Journal - Roth Williams International Society of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 8 Left horizontal MI/CR discrepancy.<br />
Figure 9 Left vertical MI/CR discrepancy.<br />
Figure 10 Transverse MI/CR discrepancy.<br />
Discussion<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the present study indicate a statistically significant<br />
improvement in MI-CR discrepancy in the right horizontal,<br />
right vertical, left vertical, and transverse planes<br />
with 2 months <strong>of</strong> gnathologic positioner wear. The condylar<br />
axis distraction differences in the left horizontal planes<br />
were not statistically significantly different. Before positioner<br />
wear, the mean right horizontal, right vertical, left vertical,<br />
and transverse measurements were 1.306 mm, 1.217 mm,<br />
1.162 mm, and 1.031 mm respectively, and fell outside the<br />
± 1.0 mm vertical and horizontal as well as the ± 0.5 mm<br />
transverse distraction envelope proposed by Crawford, Utt<br />
et al, and Slavicek. 12,13,14 Following 2 months <strong>of</strong> positioner<br />
wear, the amount <strong>of</strong> condylar distraction in these 4 measurements<br />
showed statistically significant improvement and<br />
came within the distraction envelope. Before positioner wear,<br />
3 patients (11.5%) had MI-CR discrepancy that fell within<br />
the envelope <strong>of</strong> susceptibility in all 5 <strong>of</strong> the measurements<br />
examined, while 11 patients had all 5 measurements within<br />
the envelope after positioner wear (42.3%). Reducing MI-<br />
CR discrepancies is an important treatment goal in the gnathological<br />
philosophy, and the use <strong>of</strong> gnathologic positioner<br />
is essential to achieving this goal.<br />
Although these changes were nonsignificant when compared<br />
to change in the control group, the level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />
in the right horizontal, right vertical, and left vertical<br />
planes was very close to the significance level <strong>of</strong> 0.01 used<br />
for this study, and below the more common 0.05 level <strong>of</strong><br />
significance. Figures 6, 7 and 9 show a similar pattern with<br />
reduction in MI-CR discrepancy over time with positioner<br />
wear, while the group with the Hawley retainers shows an<br />
increase in MI-CR discrepancy. This trend is observed in 3 <strong>of</strong><br />
the 5 measurements studied (right horizontal, right vertical,<br />
and left vertical planes). The positioner and control groups<br />
tend to change differently over time in the vertical and horizontal<br />
planes, with the positioner group improving and the<br />
control group getting worse. This is consistent with <strong>Roth</strong>’s<br />
claim that general retention protocols with Hawley-type appliances<br />
following orthodontic therapy will tend to make<br />
MI-CR discrepancy worse, while gnathologic positioners<br />
will improve MI-CR discrepancy. Interestingly enough, all<br />
mean vertical and horizontal CPI measurements for the control<br />
group started within the distraction envelope <strong>of</strong> ± 1.0<br />
mm and finished outside the envelope following 2 months <strong>of</strong><br />
Hawley retainer wear.<br />
The small sample size <strong>of</strong> the control group is a limitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> this study. A larger sample size would eliminate type II error<br />
and might show a statistically significant difference in the<br />
change in MI-CR discrepancy over time between the control<br />
and the positioner group. However, the p-values are below<br />
80 Chiang, Freeland, et al | Effect <strong>of</strong> Gnathologic Positioner Wear on Maximum Intercuspation CR Disharmony