17.01.2013 Views

TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review

TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review

TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conclusions and Questions<br />

This paper has documented four distinct conceptions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relationship between baptism and confirmation:<br />

1) Adult and youth initiation into the visible church through<br />

the sign-actions <strong>of</strong> one rite which included water-washing<br />

and Spirit-anointing, understood as the laying on <strong>of</strong> hands<br />

and chrismation;<br />

2) Universal infant baptism with a prolonged period before<br />

a Spirit-centered confirmation <strong>of</strong> the baptized, leading to<br />

first communion in late childhood or early adolescence;<br />

3) Infant baptism with personal confession in early adolescence<br />

which is held "to confirm" the vows taken for the<br />

confirmand at baptism by adult Christians;<br />

4) An anticipated youth/adult conversion experience followed<br />

by a confession <strong>of</strong> faith leading to baptism (with or<br />

without a rite <strong>of</strong> confirmation).<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these four differing modes <strong>of</strong> baptism/confirmation<br />

developed as a response to the specific historical situation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

church at that time. Each model is very different both in theological<br />

substance and liturgical style. Even though one has to blink hard to<br />

believe they are the same Christian rite, modern Christians must be<br />

careful in engaging in judgmental polemics about the belief system<br />

<strong>of</strong> their spiritual ancestors. <strong>The</strong>re may be elements <strong>of</strong> value in each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the historical stances. Denominations must also face squarely the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> the authority <strong>of</strong> their own heritage. How much weight<br />

should twentieth-century United Methodists, for example, place on<br />

John Wesley's understanding <strong>of</strong> the sacraments? Given the extensive<br />

developments in theological studies over the past two centuries, it<br />

would be unfortunate if contemporary ecumenical understanding, to<br />

which United Methodists have contributed considerably, were given<br />

a secondary place to the writings <strong>of</strong> a man who was, after all, <strong>of</strong> his<br />

own times.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Faith and Order Commission <strong>of</strong> the World Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Churches unequivocally supports the sacramental tenet <strong>of</strong> the early<br />

CONFIRMATION: IT S HISTORY AND MEANING 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!