TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review
TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review
TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
our thinking," respectively, with regard to the sacraments. In many<br />
ways they and our new baptismal liturgies are taking our church in a<br />
direction it has not formerly gone.<br />
Consider an all-too-superficial glance at the baptismal stance<br />
taken theologically by the predecessor denominations in America<br />
that form the United Methodist Church today.<br />
In the Articles <strong>of</strong> Religion, which, in 1784, John Wesley sent<br />
over for use by his American followers, baptism was described in<br />
Article XVII:<br />
Baptism is not only a sign <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession and mark <strong>of</strong> difference<br />
whereby Christians are distinguished from others that are not<br />
baptized; but it is also a sign <strong>of</strong> regeneration or the new birth. .<br />
Article XVII makes a somewhat lesser claim than Article XXVII<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Anglican thirty-nine Articles, from which it is adapted.<br />
Wesley's article uses the Anglican "sign <strong>of</strong> regeneration or the New<br />
Birth," but it does not suggest in any bold form that it conveys the<br />
New Birth. It seems to be a sign <strong>of</strong> God's renewing grace that may<br />
operate outside <strong>of</strong> the sacrament itself.<br />
Although the former Methodist Church held firmly to the practice<br />
<strong>of</strong> infant baptism, it did not clearly delineate a doctrine <strong>of</strong> baptism.<br />
Where it did do much thinking about baptism, it was, as Hoyt<br />
Hickman suggests, done for the purpose <strong>of</strong> justifying the practice <strong>of</strong><br />
infant baptism. 16<br />
Over a quarter century ago, Colin Williams stated<br />
that Wesley had a creative tension between the objective and the<br />
subjective, between the givenness <strong>of</strong> Christ's holiness in the Word<br />
and Sacraments and the responsive holiness <strong>of</strong> life effected in the<br />
lives <strong>of</strong> Christian believers, but that he did not spell this tension out<br />
with any force. Thus, Methodism has experienced had a great deal<br />
<strong>of</strong> confusion on the subject. Williams concluded:<br />
Apparently, understanding only the second emphasis in Wesley,<br />
American Methodism has since reduced the service <strong>of</strong> baptism to<br />
the point where it is little more than a dedication, and in British<br />
Methodism, while far more <strong>of</strong>the structure <strong>of</strong>the service has<br />
been kept, all references to regeneration were excluded in<br />
1882.<br />
BAPTISMAL REGENERATION 45