17.01.2013 Views

TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review

TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review

TJieodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Meaning of ... - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

particular way. <strong>The</strong> particularity <strong>of</strong> the letter form corresponds to<br />

the scandalous particularity (not to be confused with<br />

"individualism") <strong>of</strong> the Christian faith.<br />

More than Personal Communication. Both letters are written by<br />

church leaders to congregations <strong>of</strong> Christian people, but both<br />

represent more than a personal communication from one individual<br />

<strong>The</strong> UCCCD letter bears the signature <strong>of</strong> a single member <strong>of</strong> the<br />

congregation, the campaign chairperson, Denny Alexander.<br />

Although this letter was composed primarily by one person, it was<br />

the result <strong>of</strong> the committee process, with the names <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />

committee appearing on the letterhead. This letter represents not just<br />

an individual but the church. We are familiar with this accepted<br />

form <strong>of</strong> communication, including documents that are entirely the<br />

work <strong>of</strong> a committee sent "over the signature" <strong>of</strong> its chair or some<br />

other individual. No one called the church <strong>of</strong>fice and inquired<br />

whether the letter was composed entirely by the person whose<br />

signature it bore. <strong>The</strong> question was whether or not it represented the<br />

church.<br />

First Peter was long assumed to have been written by the Apostle<br />

Peter, whose name it bears as its first word. But we now know that<br />

in the first century it was common to compose letters in the name <strong>of</strong><br />

well-known leaders in order to perpetuate their message. <strong>The</strong> vast<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> scholars who have studied 1 Peter critically have<br />

concluded that it is such a pseudonymous letter. 4<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an important connection with Simon Peter, however,<br />

which may be outlined as follows: 5<br />

a. <strong>The</strong>re was a real person named Simeon ("Simon"), a man in<br />

the fishing business in Galilee, who had known the human Jesus<br />

personally and had been called by Jesus during his lifetime to be an<br />

apostle. Jesus renamed him "Cephas," Aramaic for "rock," which<br />

is "Peter" in Greek. He had his ups and downs as a disciple and<br />

finally denied and rejected Jesus at the time <strong>of</strong> his arrest.<br />

b. <strong>The</strong> risen Jesus appeared to Peter, reconstituted him as an<br />

apostle, and Peter became a leader in one wing <strong>of</strong> the new Christian<br />

community, the somewhat conservative Jewish-Christian wing,<br />

which looked back to the earthly Jesus and communicated the faith<br />

by handing on his sayings and told stories about him.<br />

c Peter and his wife, whose name we do not know (1 Cor. 9:5),<br />

traveled about as a missionaries. Peter finally made his way to<br />

INTERPRETING 1 PETER AS A LETTER 91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!