17.01.2013 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20040050712 Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC<br />

A CBO PAPER: Paying for Iraq’a Reconstruction<br />

Jan. 2004; 39 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A421006; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

REBUILDING Iraq after 25 years of rule by Saddam Hussein <strong>and</strong> the war that overthrew his government will be one of<br />

the USA’ foreign policy priorities in the coming years. By some estimates, the cost of reconstructing Iraq ranges from $50<br />

billion to $100 billion. However, substantial disagreement exists about that cost, as well as about how much aid from the<br />

international community may be needed to rebuild the country, whether that aid should take the form of grants or loans, how<br />

much the USA should contribute, <strong>and</strong> how much Iraq can finance itself from its future sources of revenue. To assess the scope<br />

of the reconstruction job, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), the United Nations <strong>and</strong> World Bank, <strong>and</strong> the Bechtel<br />

Corporation (under contract to the U.S. Agency for International Development) carried out surveys of Iraq’s needs in 2003.<br />

The needs that they identified are mainly associated with the deterioration of Iraqi infrastructure that has occurred since Iraq<br />

invaded Iran in 1980. The surveys indicate that although sanctions imposed during the 1990s <strong>and</strong> damage from recent postwar<br />

looting have worsened the condition of Iraq’s infrastructure, they are not the most significant cause of its poor state.<br />

DTIC<br />

Construction; Cost Estimates; Iraq<br />

42<br />

GEOSCIENCES (GENERAL)<br />

Includes general research topics related to the Earth sciences, <strong>and</strong> the specific areas of petrology, mineralogy, <strong>and</strong> general geology. For<br />

other specific topics in geosciences see categories 42 through 48.<br />

20040050248 West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV, USA<br />

Evaluation of Roof Bolting Requirements Based on In-Mine Roof Bolter Drilling. Quarterly <strong>Technical</strong> Progress Report,<br />

July 1, 2001-September 30, 2001<br />

Peng, S. S.; Oct. 2001; 12 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): DE2004-819900; No Copyright; Avail: Department of Energy Information Bridge<br />

Roof bolting is the most popular method for underground openings in the mining industry, especially in the bedded<br />

deposits such as coal, potash, salt etc. In fact, all U.S. underground coal mine entries are roof-bolted as required by law.<br />

However, roof falls still occur frequently in the roof bolted entries. The two possible reasons are: the lack of knowledge of<br />

<strong>and</strong> technology to detect the roof geological conditions in advance of mining, <strong>and</strong> lack of roof bolting design criteria for<br />

modern roof bolting systems. This research is to develop a method for predicting the roof geology <strong>and</strong> stability condition in<br />

real time during roof bolting operation. Based on such information, roof bolting design criteria for modern roof bolting<br />

systems will be developed for implementation in real time.<br />

NTIS<br />

Roofs; Bolts; Drilling; Structural Properties (Geology); Mines (Excavations)<br />

20040050937 State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA, Waseda Univ., Tokyo, Japan, University of Southern California,<br />

Los Angeles, CA, USA<br />

Proceeedings of the U.S.-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities <strong>and</strong> Countermeasures<br />

against Soil Liquefaction (8th)<br />

Hamada, M.; Bardet, J. P.; ORourke, T. D.; Jun. 30, 2003; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB2004-104386; MCEER-03-0003; No Copyright; Avail: National <strong>Technical</strong> Information Service (NTIS)<br />

The proceedings of this workshop are part of a longst<strong>and</strong>ing US-Japan cooperative research activity that focuses on<br />

earthquake resistant design of lifeline facilities <strong>and</strong> countermeasures against soil liquefaction. Since its inception, this activity<br />

has assisted other research agendas, such as cooperative research among the U.S. Earthquake Engineering Research Centers<br />

<strong>and</strong> the U.S.-Japan Cooperative Research Program on Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation. In the future, US-Japan<br />

cooperative research on lifelines <strong>and</strong> liquefaction will benefit from collaborative experimentation <strong>and</strong> analytical modeling at<br />

many of the superb testing facilities both in Japan <strong>and</strong> within the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering<br />

Simulation (NEES).<br />

NTIS<br />

Earthquake Resistant Structures; Mathematical Models; Soils; Earthquakes<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!