17.01.2013 Views

Clinical Practice Guidelines - National Health and Medical Research ...

Clinical Practice Guidelines - National Health and Medical Research ...

Clinical Practice Guidelines - National Health and Medical Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 14 STAGING AND REPORTING<br />

Staging of Colorectal Cancer refers to the classification of the tumour according to the extent of<br />

spread in a manner that has a clinically useful correlation with prognosis.<br />

Applications of staging include patient management, quality assurance <strong>and</strong> research.<br />

A number of imaging techniques, including endorectal ultrasound, will define the extent of tumour<br />

spread at the time of diagnosis. There is, however, no known, reliable, preoperative staging system<br />

that correlates accurately with patient survival.<br />

14.1 Development of postsurgical staging<br />

The first well-documented <strong>and</strong> tested staging system was that of Dukes. 1 This system was based<br />

entirely on the extent of direct tumour spread <strong>and</strong> the presence or absence of lymph node metastases<br />

in the resected specimen of bowel. Although Dukes staging was originally described for rectal cancer,<br />

it has also been shown to also be applicable to colonic cancer. Dukes stages A, B <strong>and</strong> C correlated<br />

well with patient survival, <strong>and</strong> they were easy to recall <strong>and</strong> apply. For these reasons the system was<br />

widely adopted. However, the Dukes system did not seek to address the issue of residual tumour,<br />

either local, due to tumour transection, or due to known distant metastases.<br />

The Dukes A, B, C system was broadened by Turnbull, who added a stage D for cases with known<br />

distant metastases <strong>and</strong> locally advanced tumour. 2 Thus, Turnbull introduced the concept of<br />

clinicopathological staging in which distant metastases, found by the surgeon at the time of bowel<br />

resection, could determine the assigned stage. Clinicopathological staging has now gained wide<br />

acceptance as the preferred method of staging.<br />

14.2 Selection of a clinicopathological staging system<br />

The two main clinicopathological staging systems available, the Australian clinicopathological<br />

staging (ACPS) system <strong>and</strong> pathological staging (pTNM — tumour, node, metastasis), may both be<br />

seen as extensions of the original Dukes staging method.<br />

The ACPS system was recommended for use in Australia following two workshops on staging held in<br />

Brisbane in 1981. 3 The system was validated using prospectively collected data from the Concord<br />

Hospital Colorectal Cancer Project. The ACPS is essentially a simplified version of the system used at<br />

Concord Hospital since 1971. 4,5 The ACPS <strong>and</strong> Concord systems are shown in Table 14.1.<br />

Staging <strong>and</strong> reporting 159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!