Download to Read More - UWASNET

More documents

Recommendations

Info

UGX Billion 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Figure 2.2.1 District Water and Sanitation Conditional Grant Trends, 2002/03 to 2008/09 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 14 2006/07 Financial Year 2007/08 2008/09 Budget Release Expend A comparison of district by district expenditure by NGOs vs. GoU expenditure has not been possible for the purpose of this report, for the following reasons: a. the vast majority of reporting NGOs operate in more than one district, and the reporting format does not allow for specification of expenditure per district; and b. while expenditure separation for service delivery (e.g. boreholes constructed my be achieved, this is problematic to do with ‘software’ activities such as policy monitoring and advocacy. As previously noted, the member NGO reporting rate 53.3% does not allow this report to present a complete picture of NGO investment. it is therefore likely that actual NGO expenditure is higher than specified in this Report. 2.2.2 Population served According to the reports received, the number of beneficiaries from NGO WASH interventions is estimated at 3,292,233. Figure 2.2.1 shows the share of beneficiaries according to area of residence (rural, urban, Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps) where this has been specified. It is clear that rural beneficiaries form the majority of beneficiaries of NGO interventions in water, sanitation and hygiene. This is consistent with the fact that the majority of reporting NGOs operate in rural areas, and with the composition of Uganda’s population, the majority of which resides in rural areas. Figure 2.2.1 Share of population served by NGOs by area Urban 3% IDP camps 4% it is important to note that estimating accurately the number of beneficiaries remains a challenge for many NGOs, due to lack of accurate information systems, lack of capacity and high staff turnover and technological constraints, as well as partnership approaches in larger NGOs, whereby the funding NGO channels its funds through an implementing partner NGO. The numbers provided here should thus be viewed realistically, since they represent only those cases in which reporting NGOs have estimated the number of beneficiaries. An estimate of the number of beneficiaries according to facilities constructed and using standard estimates has been made in Section 3.4. Rural 93%
3. Performance of NGOs against the WASH Sector Golden Indicators 3.1 Introduction. Water seller in Wobulenzi, Luwero District. Photograph by Y. Velleman NGOs operating within the WASH Sector play an important role in contributing to and enhancing the Sector Performance Monitoring Framework. This chapter is structured to allow for reporting against each of the sector’s Golden Indicators, which are used as benchmarks for assessing WASH sector performance in Uganda. These are: 1. Access: % of people within 1.5 km (rural) and 0.2 km (urban) of an improved water source 2. Functionality: % of improved water sources that are functional at time of spot-check (rural); Ratio of the actual hours of water supply to the required hours of supply (Urban) 3. Per Capita Investment Cost: Average cost per beneficiary of new water and sanitation schemes 4. Sanitation: % of people with access to improved sanitation 5. Water Quality: % of water samples taken at the point of water collection, waste discharge point that comply with national standards. 6. Quantity of Water: % increase in cumulative storage capacity of Water for Production 7. Equity: Mean Sub-County deviation from the District average in persons per improved water point. 8. Hand-washing: % of people with access to (and using) hand-washing facilities. 9. Management: % of water points with actively functioning Water & Sanitation Committees/ Boards. 10. Gender: % of Water User committees/Water Boards with women holding key positions. 15
Page 1 and 2: NGO Group Performance in the Uganda
Page 3 and 4: 3.10.2 Enhancing the functionality
Page 5 and 6: ACRONMY CHAST - Children’s Hygien
Page 7 and 8: f. Water quantity: most reporting N
Page 9 and 10: 1. Introduction 1.1 Background The
Page 11 and 12: Its mission is to strengthen Uganda
Page 13: Overall, this financial year has se
Page 17 and 18: 3.3 Functionality Golden Indicator
Page 19 and 20: Table 3.4: Total investment and out
Page 21 and 22: 0% 0% Figure 3.5.1: Output/Facility
Page 23 and 24: esulting in improved school sanitat
Page 25 and 26: transportation and point of consump
Page 27 and 28: Samaritan Community Development Pro
Page 29 and 30: 3.8.2.i CASE STUDIES: Mainstreaming
Page 31 and 32: approach of promoting school hygien
Page 33 and 34: 3.9.2.i CASE STUDY: Lutheran World
Page 35 and 36: The increased capacity of WUCs has
Page 37 and 38: 4. Operations of NGOs under the Nor
Page 39 and 40: 4.4 Achievements in 2008/09 As prev
Page 41 and 42: The creation of social institutions
Page 43 and 44: Governance in the Water Sector thro
Page 45 and 46: 5.4.i CASE STUDY: Ecological Christ
Page 47 and 48: 6. Challenges, Recommendations and
Page 49 and 50: 6.2.3 Water-stressed areas A strate
Page 51 and 52: Christian Engineers in Development
Page 53: Rural Country Integrated Developmen

Download to Read More - UWASNET

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?