19.01.2013 Views

Transportation Management Report 2011 - Capgemini

Transportation Management Report 2011 - Capgemini

Transportation Management Report 2011 - Capgemini

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2: Distribution Network Optimization considerations<br />

• Evaluate scenario results: Each<br />

scenario needs to be judged by its<br />

relationship to total operational<br />

costs and the savings generated<br />

compared to the current situation.<br />

What is important for your<br />

managers in this phase is to analyse<br />

the impact of those scenarios on<br />

other aspects of the organization,<br />

such as human resources, legal<br />

(regulations, taxes), contracts with<br />

3PLs and other logistics providers,<br />

transportation availability, total<br />

investment required, and potential<br />

risks. Considering all these issues<br />

will allow you to select the scenario<br />

that best suits the objectives for<br />

cost and carbon footprint and,<br />

ultimately, satisfies all stakeholders’<br />

needs.<br />

11<br />

5<br />

Participate<br />

in<br />

calibration<br />

4<br />

6<br />

Evaluate<br />

Scenario results<br />

Provide<br />

accurate<br />

information<br />

3<br />

1<br />

Identify<br />

potential<br />

scenarios<br />

Define clear<br />

objectives<br />

2<br />

Define<br />

volume plans<br />

The best results for the project will<br />

be obtained if managers know exactly<br />

what to ask, what information to<br />

consider, and the impact of changes<br />

on the organization as a whole.<br />

In a demand-driven supply<br />

chain, distribution networks<br />

are usually designed to satisfy<br />

commercial conditions such as<br />

client agreements, service levels,<br />

delivery frequency, direct shipments,<br />

and lead times. These conditions<br />

become design parameters. We<br />

recommend organizations also<br />

consider what impact changing<br />

these variables will have on cost<br />

savings. In addition to having general<br />

management sponsorship, we<br />

strongly recommend, involving other<br />

functional areas, such as marketing<br />

and sales in the scenario definition<br />

and evaluation process.<br />

Besides obtaining the most costefficient<br />

network configuration, we<br />

have found that analyzing network<br />

costs can lead to the identification of<br />

specific needs for implementing TMS<br />

software, such as load design, route<br />

planning, or carrier selection. And<br />

it can also identify potential areas<br />

where cost reductions and savings<br />

might be available in the short term,<br />

for instance:<br />

• Optimization of inventory<br />

management<br />

• Lower transportation costs by<br />

consolidation of LTL shipments<br />

• Reduction of lead times<br />

• Lower transportation costs by<br />

changes in rates, frequency, and<br />

elimination of errors and non<br />

value-added services<br />

In summary, there are both internal<br />

and external variables (such as<br />

economic context and market<br />

changes) that could make your<br />

distribution network inflexible<br />

and expensive. A distribution<br />

network optimization project, using<br />

advanced simulation software, can<br />

lead to important cost reductions<br />

for a company and allow them to<br />

incorporate green planning into their<br />

network design. When a company<br />

wants to undertake such a project,<br />

both general and supply chain<br />

management should be clear on the<br />

objectives pursued, the premises and<br />

possible scenarios to be evaluated,<br />

and should participate in the<br />

evaluation of solutions presented by<br />

the software, in order to select the<br />

best network configuration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!