20.01.2013 Views

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

suggests that <strong>the</strong> chances <strong>of</strong> exiting income poverty are in most countries<br />

quite high. At <strong>the</strong> same time about 41 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poor in <strong>the</strong> year<br />

1997 did never escape from poverty in a four-year period, which also<br />

indicates a perpetuating process <strong>of</strong> social exclusion.<br />

We may note <strong>the</strong> following on <strong>the</strong> country level:<br />

• Denmark is <strong>the</strong> country with <strong>the</strong> lowest risk <strong>of</strong> persistent poverty<br />

with reference to <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty in any particular year. It is<br />

also <strong>the</strong> country with <strong>the</strong> lowest at-risk-<strong>of</strong>-poverty rate in 1997. In<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r words, in Denmark both <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> becoming poor and <strong>the</strong> risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> remaining poor are ra<strong>the</strong>r low.<br />

• At <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r extreme we find France. In France almost one in five<br />

persons faced <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> poverty in 1997. More than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

had been in this state since 1994 – a significant proportion. Similar,<br />

albeit not extreme, is <strong>the</strong> situation in <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

• In Italy but also Ireland <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty risk at any particular<br />

year is quite high – almost as high or even higher than in France or<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK. Yet a much smaller fraction <strong>of</strong> those who were in a state <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty risk in 1997 had been poor since 1994.<br />

• Germany, Austria and Belgium are <strong>the</strong> countries closest to <strong>the</strong><br />

European average. <strong>The</strong>y all display average or below average<br />

poverty risks at any particular year and likewise with <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong><br />

persistent poverty. <strong>The</strong> situation in <strong>the</strong>se countries is not as good as<br />

in Denmark but also not as bad as in France and <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

Entry and exit into poverty<br />

Pathways to income poverty and social exclusion can be studied with<br />

survey data through logistic regression. <strong>The</strong> variety <strong>of</strong> possible<br />

explanatory circumstances and <strong>the</strong>ir interrelationships makes it<br />

impossible to identify patterns solely on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> descriptive analysis.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> EUROHOME-IMPACT study we pooled data for eight countries<br />

(see tables 2 to 4 above) and included only those variables for which we<br />

found a difference from <strong>the</strong> average entry risk which exceeded four<br />

percentage points in a multivariate model.<br />

<strong>The</strong> variables that were originally included in <strong>the</strong> logistic regression to<br />

predict <strong>the</strong> propensity to fall into poverty were:<br />

1. Demographic background variables (country, age and gender <strong>of</strong> main<br />

earner)<br />

2. Socio-economic characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> household (household type,<br />

work attachment and educational level)<br />

EUROHOME-IMPACT FINAL REPORT 38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!