The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bradbury, B., Jenkins, S.P., Micklewright, J. (2000),’Child Poverty Dynamics in Seven Nations’, DIW Discussion Paper, No. 235, Berlin, DIW Bradshaw J. et al. (2000), ‘The relationship between poverty and social exclusion in Britain’, Paper prepared for the IARIW Conference Cracow, Poland, September 2000 Canberra Group (2001), Expert Group on Household and Income Statistics – The Canberra Group, Final Report and Recommendations, Ottawa Dirven, H.-J. et al. (2000), Income Poverty and Social Exclusion in the European Member States; First European Social Report, Eurostat. EUROSTAT (1998), ‘31 st Meeting of the Statistical Programme Committee, Luxembourg, 26 & 27 November 1998- Recommendations on Social Exclusion and Poverty Statistics’, Luxemburg Field, A. (2000), Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows- Advanced Techniques for the Beginner, London: Sage Förster, M.F, Redl, J, Tentschert , U, Till, M (2001), ‘Dimensions of Poverty in Austria in the Late 1990s’, ICCR Working Paper, No. 508, Vienna, ICCR Giorgi, L. (1990), Aspects of the Subjective Culture of Modernity; An Analysis of the European Values Survey 1981 on European Attitudes towards Religion, Work, Politics and Well-Being, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge, U.K. Giorgi L. et al. (1997), Zur Situation von österreichischen Haushalten, Vienna, ICCR Giorgi, L. (1997), The social situation of Austrian households in 1994; Results from ECHP 1st wave, Vienna, ICCR Giorgi, L. (1998), The social situation of Austrian households in 1995; Results from ECHP 2nd wave, Vienna, ICCR Giorgi, L. and Pohoryles, R. (1999), ‘Income Analysis and Social Inclusion Policies’, Innovation; the European Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4), pp.549-566 Giorgi, L. and Steiner, H. (1997), ‚Armut und Armutsbekämpfung in Österreich’, in Bericht über die soziale Lage 1996, Vienna, Federal Ministry for Social Affairs Giorgi, L. and Steiner, H. (1998), ‚Armutsgefährdung und Armut in Österreich’, in Bericht über die soziale Lage 1997, Vienna, Federal Ministry for Social Affairs EUROHOME-IMPACT FINAL REPORT 88
Heitzmann, K. (1999), Transitions to adulthood, lone parenthood, sickness or disability and retirement: an empirical analysis of the ECHP for Austria, TSER project report: Family Structure, Labour Market Participation and the Dynamics of Social Exclusion, Vienna, University of Economics Department for Social Policy Heitzmann, K. (forthcoming 2002), ‘Characteristics and dynamics of income poverty and multidimensional deprivation in Austria’, in Apopospori, E. und Millar, J. (eds.). The Dynamics of Social Exclusion in Europe. Comparing Austria, Germany, Greece, Portugal and the UK, Aldershot, Edward Elgar. Heuberger, R. (2001), Querschnittsbericht 6. Welle, 2000, ECHP-Austria Forschungsberichte, Vienna, ICCR Jarvis, S., Jenkins S.P. (1995), ’Do the poor stay poor? New evidence about income dynamics from the British Household Panel Survey’, ISER Occasional Paper, 95-2, Colchester, ISER Jenkins, S.P. (1998), ’Modelling Household Income Dynamics’, ISER Occasional Paper, Colchester, ISER Layte, R., Maitre, B. Nolan, B and Whelan, C. T (2000a), ‘Persistent and Consistent Poverty: An Analysis of the First Two Waves of the European Community Household Panel’, European Panel Analysis Group, Working Paper 11 Layte, R., Maitre, B. Nolan, B and Whelan, C. T (2001), ‘Explaining Deprivation in the European Union’, Acta Sociologica Maître, B. Nolan, B. (1999),’Income Mobility in the European Community Household Panel Survey’, European Panel Analysis Group, Working Paper 4 Mejer, L. (1999), ‘Social Exclusion statistics’, Conference Papers, Statistics Users’ Council / CEIES Joint Conference, 22 November 1999 Muffels, R., Fouarge, D., Dekker, R.(1999), ’Longitudinal Poverty and Income Inequality: A Comparative Panel Study for the Netherlands, Germany and the UK’ , European Panel Analysis Group, Working Paper Oxley, H., T.-T. Dang and P. Antolín (1999), ‘Poverty Dynamics in Four OECD Countries’, Economics Department Working Papers No. 212, Paris, OECD Oxley, H., T.-T. Dang and P. Antolín (2000), ‘Poverty Dynamics in Six OECD Countries’, OECD Economic Studies No. 30, pp. 7-52, Paris Redl, H. (2001), ECHP-Austria Forschungsberichte: Armut und Wohlfahrt im Längsschnitt, Vienna, ICCR Room, G. (ed.) (1995), Beyond the Threshold: the Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion, Bristol, the Policy Press EUROHOME-IMPACT FINAL REPORT 89
Page 1 and 2:
EUROHOME-IMPACT The Housing Dimensi
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Abstract_________
Page 5 and 6:
large numbers of persons facing hou
Page 7 and 8:
[1.6] The most important actors in
Page 9 and 10:
Germany, Luxembourg and the UK: the
Page 11 and 12:
involvement: first, through the org
Page 13 and 14:
2 Background and objectives of the
Page 15 and 16:
Deliverable R[4] has sought to form
Page 17 and 18:
policy reform at the substantive le
Page 19 and 20:
ole as that of supporting all to th
Page 21 and 22:
Owner occupation is the primary pol
Page 23 and 24:
of payment, disturbance of domestic
Page 25 and 26:
Social housing The social housing s
Page 27 and 28:
provide rent assistance to the poor
Page 29 and 30:
Social tenants may purchase their h
Page 31 and 32:
- The accommodation is characterise
Page 33 and 34:
The summary statistics indicate tha
Page 35 and 36:
Pure crowding or affordability prob
Page 37 and 38: Table 3. Any-time poverty rate vs.
Page 39 and 40: 3. Housing related characteristics
Page 41 and 42: The implications of our logistic re
Page 43 and 44: Europe. Across the EU-14, 54 per ce
Page 45 and 46: close to a 0 percent reduction rate
Page 47 and 48: Effectiveness Assessing the effecti
Page 49 and 50: Transferability This dimension comp
Page 51 and 52: activities and mediation have been
Page 53 and 54: The DCCSS staff support rough sleep
Page 55 and 56: were less marginalized and deprived
Page 57 and 58: isolation and lack of social networ
Page 59 and 60: deliberation with service providers
Page 61 and 62: 4 Conclusions and recommendations I
Page 63 and 64: (b) When evaluating the ‘success
Page 65 and 66: like, for instance, the gini coeffi
Page 67 and 68: anti-poverty strategies can therefo
Page 69 and 70: 5 Dissemination and exploitation of
Page 71 and 72: 70 pages Available also in French D
Page 73 and 74: Berthoud, R. and Gerschuny, J. (eds
Page 75 and 76: European Commission (1997), Social
Page 77 and 78: Kleinman, M. (1996), Housing, Welfa
Page 79 and 80: Whelan, C. T., Layte, R., Maître,
Page 81 and 82: ueber Wohnquartiere in den alten un
Page 83 and 84: Istat (1996), Famiglie, abitazioni,
Page 85 and 86: Havel, M., Fink, K. and Barta, H. (
Page 87: North Y. et al. (1996), Le Logement
Page 91 and 92: Whelan, C. T., Layte, R., Maitre, B
Page 93 and 94: Redl, H. (2001), ECHP-Austria Forsc
Page 95 and 96: Rossi, P. H. & Freeman H. E., Evalu
Page 97 and 98: G. Schuler-Wallner/I. Mühlich-Klin
Page 99 and 100: Kristensen, H. (1999) Housing Polic
Page 101 and 102: Department of Health (2000): The He
Page 103 and 104: Avramov, D. (1999a) Background Pape
Page 105 and 106: Esping-Andersen, G. ed. (1996) Welf
Page 107 and 108: EUROSTAT (2001) The Social Situatio
Page 109 and 110: Pilgram A. H. Steinert (2001) Socia
show all

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?