20.01.2013 Views

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

integration, however not a guarantee in itself for independent living.<br />

Having a job and earning one’s living is ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> decisive step in this<br />

latter regard.<br />

Considering <strong>the</strong> above, <strong>the</strong>re is a strong need for providing social support<br />

after re-housing has taken place. It is necessary to support both formal<br />

and informal forms <strong>of</strong> cooperation between housing services and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

specialized services (in <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> education, training and employment,<br />

addiction, mental and physical health).<br />

Multidimensional support can be provided in ‘integrated packages’ or<br />

through more flexible and more ‘sectoral’ interventions with priorities for<br />

special areas (e.g. housing) and additional help where needed for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> reintegration (health, employment, social relations). <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is no a priori preference for ei<strong>the</strong>r approach as long as <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

conceptual and, where relevant, operational linkage <strong>of</strong> objectives,<br />

programmes and services – across organisations if necessary.<br />

<strong>The</strong> staircase model<br />

One debate <strong>of</strong> particular importance regarding homeless policies, in<br />

particular, concerns <strong>the</strong> question to what extent it may be legitimate to<br />

refuse homeless people with problems such as alcoholism or drug<br />

addiction, support with gaining access to normal housing or to condition<br />

such access on <strong>the</strong> accomplishment <strong>of</strong> different stages <strong>of</strong> re-integration<br />

and probation periods in special accommodation.<br />

Strongly integrated packages <strong>of</strong> social support including rigid<br />

supervision regimes following <strong>the</strong> so-called ‘staircase model’ <strong>of</strong><br />

integration should be restricted to those who face severe forms <strong>of</strong><br />

marginalisation in conjunction with chronic health or mental problems.<br />

Even in <strong>the</strong>se cases <strong>the</strong>y should be limited in terms <strong>of</strong> time to <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

extent possible.<br />

In general, self-sustained permanent housing is to be preferred as<br />

compared to transitory and/or collective housing, even if <strong>the</strong> latter is<br />

sensible for a certain period <strong>of</strong> time and for specific risk groups.<br />

Personal support with re-socialisation<br />

In order to re-integrate marginalized persons, material support, like<br />

access to housing, financial assistance as well as support with finding a<br />

job or training, is essential but not sufficient. Personal support is equally<br />

important, and even indispensable for those with severe marginalization<br />

experiences. Personal support should encourage motivation and a sense<br />

<strong>of</strong> responsibility and help in withstanding crisis situations. Emotional<br />

support is <strong>of</strong> particular importance in <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> widespread social<br />

EUROHOME-IMPACT FINAL REPORT 56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!