The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6 Acknowledgement and references 6.1 Acknowledge and disclaimer The EUROHOME-IMPACT project was funded by the European Community under the ‘Improving the Socio-Economic Knowledge Base’ Programme (1998-2002). The project participants wish to thank the European Commission for making it possible to realise this project. This final report was produced in the framework of the EUROHOME- IMPACT project. The authors are solely responsible for the information in this document. The European Community is in no way responsible or liable for the contents of this document or the use made of it. 6.2 List of project deliverables Deliverable 1 Housing Stress: An Overview of Risk Populations and Policies in the EU February 2001 93 pages Deliverable 2 Causes of Poverty and Social Exclusion February 2002 63 pages (excluding tabular annex) Deliverable 3 What Determines Housing Integration at the Micro-Level? The Impact of Welfare Regimes and Social Transfers October 2002 55 pages Deliverable 4 Policy Impact Analysis April 2003 23 pages Deliverable 5 An Evaluation Tool of Social Re-integration Programmes; The Analytic Evaluation January 2001 EUROHOME-IMPACT FINAL REPORT 70
70 pages Available also in French Deliverable 6 Evaluation Studies of Social Services (Switzerland, Austria, Denmark) June 2003 300 pages Deliverable 7 Does Re-Housing Lead to Re-integration? Follow-up Studies of Re-housed Homeless Persons (Germany, Ireland, Italy) & Synthesis Report August 2002 300 pages Deliverable 8 An Evaluation Tool – Revision of D5 based on Case Study Material June 2003 20 pages Deliverable 9 Quality Assurance in Social Public Services and their Possible Application to Services for Homeless People February 2003 24 pages Deliverable 10 Housing and Human Dignity: An Integrated Approach to Standard- Setting March 2003 62 pages In addition to the above project reports, the EUROHOME-IMPACT project has produced a series of working and conference papers which can be downloaded, like the reports above, from the project’s Web Site at www.iccr-international.org/impact EUROHOME-IMPACT FINAL REPORT 71
Page 1 and 2:
EUROHOME-IMPACT The Housing Dimensi
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Abstract_________
Page 5 and 6:
large numbers of persons facing hou
Page 7 and 8:
[1.6] The most important actors in
Page 9 and 10:
Germany, Luxembourg and the UK: the
Page 11 and 12:
involvement: first, through the org
Page 13 and 14:
2 Background and objectives of the
Page 15 and 16:
Deliverable R[4] has sought to form
Page 17 and 18:
policy reform at the substantive le
Page 19 and 20: ole as that of supporting all to th
Page 21 and 22: Owner occupation is the primary pol
Page 23 and 24: of payment, disturbance of domestic
Page 25 and 26: Social housing The social housing s
Page 27 and 28: provide rent assistance to the poor
Page 29 and 30: Social tenants may purchase their h
Page 31 and 32: - The accommodation is characterise
Page 33 and 34: The summary statistics indicate tha
Page 35 and 36: Pure crowding or affordability prob
Page 37 and 38: Table 3. Any-time poverty rate vs.
Page 39 and 40: 3. Housing related characteristics
Page 41 and 42: The implications of our logistic re
Page 43 and 44: Europe. Across the EU-14, 54 per ce
Page 45 and 46: close to a 0 percent reduction rate
Page 47 and 48: Effectiveness Assessing the effecti
Page 49 and 50: Transferability This dimension comp
Page 51 and 52: activities and mediation have been
Page 53 and 54: The DCCSS staff support rough sleep
Page 55 and 56: were less marginalized and deprived
Page 57 and 58: isolation and lack of social networ
Page 59 and 60: deliberation with service providers
Page 61 and 62: 4 Conclusions and recommendations I
Page 63 and 64: (b) When evaluating the ‘success
Page 65 and 66: like, for instance, the gini coeffi
Page 67 and 68: anti-poverty strategies can therefo
Page 69: 5 Dissemination and exploitation of
Page 73 and 74: Berthoud, R. and Gerschuny, J. (eds
Page 75 and 76: European Commission (1997), Social
Page 77 and 78: Kleinman, M. (1996), Housing, Welfa
Page 79 and 80: Whelan, C. T., Layte, R., Maître,
Page 81 and 82: ueber Wohnquartiere in den alten un
Page 83 and 84: Istat (1996), Famiglie, abitazioni,
Page 85 and 86: Havel, M., Fink, K. and Barta, H. (
Page 87 and 88: North Y. et al. (1996), Le Logement
Page 89 and 90: Heitzmann, K. (1999), Transitions t
Page 91 and 92: Whelan, C. T., Layte, R., Maitre, B
Page 93 and 94: Redl, H. (2001), ECHP-Austria Forsc
Page 95 and 96: Rossi, P. H. & Freeman H. E., Evalu
Page 97 and 98: G. Schuler-Wallner/I. Mühlich-Klin
Page 99 and 100: Kristensen, H. (1999) Housing Polic
Page 101 and 102: Department of Health (2000): The He
Page 103 and 104: Avramov, D. (1999a) Background Pape
Page 105 and 106: Esping-Andersen, G. ed. (1996) Welf
Page 107 and 108: EUROSTAT (2001) The Social Situatio
Page 109 and 110: Pilgram A. H. Steinert (2001) Socia
show all

The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform - the ICCR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?