23.01.2013 Views

PLI version Southport Seafront SPG - Sefton Council

PLI version Southport Seafront SPG - Sefton Council

PLI version Southport Seafront SPG - Sefton Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> – supplementary planning guidance – November 2003<br />

Table A7 Summary of comments and responses – <strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> <strong>SPG</strong><br />

Objector/<br />

organisation Summary of comment<br />

Change<br />

to<br />

<strong>SPG</strong>?<br />

Summary of response<br />

General comments about all <strong>SPG</strong>s<br />

Garden<br />

History<br />

Society<br />

No comments N/A Response is noted.<br />

Formby Civic Write to support all of N/A Support is noted.<br />

Society the <strong>SPG</strong>s.<br />

<strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> – summary of consultation comments and responses<br />

West WLYC have a general Yes Reference to the value of the<br />

Lancashire objection that the value<br />

lake for sailing and other water-<br />

Yacht Club of the Marine Lake for<br />

based sports should indeed be<br />

sailing is not properly<br />

included in the <strong>SPG</strong>. With<br />

recognised. They also<br />

regard to greenspace it is made<br />

object to development of<br />

clear in the <strong>SPG</strong> that to<br />

greenspace in the<br />

maintain the <strong>Seafront</strong>’s<br />

<strong>Seafront</strong>, and<br />

attractiveness for visitors, and<br />

specifically to<br />

to increase all year round use,<br />

development of the<br />

some areas of greenspace will<br />

North Marine Lake site<br />

need to be incorporated in<br />

on the basis it would<br />

development sites. However,<br />

affect the amenity of the<br />

this is conditional upon<br />

area and have an<br />

requirements for public use,<br />

adverse impact on<br />

and design quality. The North<br />

sailing.<br />

Marine Lake site is privatelyowned,<br />

and the purpose of the<br />

<strong>SPG</strong> is to define the type and<br />

scale of development that<br />

would be acceptable. It is<br />

considered the guidance in the<br />

<strong>SPG</strong> would retain the amenity<br />

value of the site. The need to<br />

take into account impact on<br />

lake sailing should be added to<br />

these provisions.<br />

West<br />

Lancashire<br />

Yacht Club<br />

Weightman<br />

Vizards on<br />

behalf of<br />

Silcock<br />

Leisure<br />

Group (SLG)<br />

Suggest changes to the<br />

objectives set out in<br />

Appendix 1 of the <strong>SPG</strong><br />

1. SLG object to the<br />

repositioning of the<br />

tented structure<br />

(currently at the Pier<br />

entrance on the Pier<br />

Forecourt<br />

2. They object to the<br />

removal of the deck to<br />

No The objectives in Appendix 1<br />

relate to the Mersey Waterfront<br />

Regional Park proposals<br />

prepared by The Mersey<br />

Partnership and are for<br />

reference only.<br />

No 1. Tented structure: The<br />

possibility of repositioning the<br />

structure arose as a suggestion<br />

from SLG themselves in<br />

various earlier discussions on<br />

possible expansion of Funland.<br />

The proposal is put forward as<br />

an option, not a requirement.<br />

The structure is in fact owned<br />

43 of 44<br />

D:\Files\01_02_16_UDP_Revw_<strong>SPG</strong>s_Gen\01_02_16_18_<strong>SPG</strong>s_<strong>PLI</strong>_Version\<strong>PLI</strong> <strong>version</strong> <strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> <strong>SPG</strong>.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!