PLI version Southport Seafront SPG - Sefton Council
PLI version Southport Seafront SPG - Sefton Council
PLI version Southport Seafront SPG - Sefton Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> – supplementary planning guidance – November 2003<br />
Table A7 Summary of comments and responses – <strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> <strong>SPG</strong><br />
Objector/<br />
organisation Summary of comment<br />
Change<br />
to<br />
<strong>SPG</strong>?<br />
Summary of response<br />
General comments about all <strong>SPG</strong>s<br />
Garden<br />
History<br />
Society<br />
No comments N/A Response is noted.<br />
Formby Civic Write to support all of N/A Support is noted.<br />
Society the <strong>SPG</strong>s.<br />
<strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> – summary of consultation comments and responses<br />
West WLYC have a general Yes Reference to the value of the<br />
Lancashire objection that the value<br />
lake for sailing and other water-<br />
Yacht Club of the Marine Lake for<br />
based sports should indeed be<br />
sailing is not properly<br />
included in the <strong>SPG</strong>. With<br />
recognised. They also<br />
regard to greenspace it is made<br />
object to development of<br />
clear in the <strong>SPG</strong> that to<br />
greenspace in the<br />
maintain the <strong>Seafront</strong>’s<br />
<strong>Seafront</strong>, and<br />
attractiveness for visitors, and<br />
specifically to<br />
to increase all year round use,<br />
development of the<br />
some areas of greenspace will<br />
North Marine Lake site<br />
need to be incorporated in<br />
on the basis it would<br />
development sites. However,<br />
affect the amenity of the<br />
this is conditional upon<br />
area and have an<br />
requirements for public use,<br />
adverse impact on<br />
and design quality. The North<br />
sailing.<br />
Marine Lake site is privatelyowned,<br />
and the purpose of the<br />
<strong>SPG</strong> is to define the type and<br />
scale of development that<br />
would be acceptable. It is<br />
considered the guidance in the<br />
<strong>SPG</strong> would retain the amenity<br />
value of the site. The need to<br />
take into account impact on<br />
lake sailing should be added to<br />
these provisions.<br />
West<br />
Lancashire<br />
Yacht Club<br />
Weightman<br />
Vizards on<br />
behalf of<br />
Silcock<br />
Leisure<br />
Group (SLG)<br />
Suggest changes to the<br />
objectives set out in<br />
Appendix 1 of the <strong>SPG</strong><br />
1. SLG object to the<br />
repositioning of the<br />
tented structure<br />
(currently at the Pier<br />
entrance on the Pier<br />
Forecourt<br />
2. They object to the<br />
removal of the deck to<br />
No The objectives in Appendix 1<br />
relate to the Mersey Waterfront<br />
Regional Park proposals<br />
prepared by The Mersey<br />
Partnership and are for<br />
reference only.<br />
No 1. Tented structure: The<br />
possibility of repositioning the<br />
structure arose as a suggestion<br />
from SLG themselves in<br />
various earlier discussions on<br />
possible expansion of Funland.<br />
The proposal is put forward as<br />
an option, not a requirement.<br />
The structure is in fact owned<br />
43 of 44<br />
D:\Files\01_02_16_UDP_Revw_<strong>SPG</strong>s_Gen\01_02_16_18_<strong>SPG</strong>s_<strong>PLI</strong>_Version\<strong>PLI</strong> <strong>version</strong> <strong>Southport</strong> <strong>Seafront</strong> <strong>SPG</strong>.doc