PLI version Southport Seafront SPG - Sefton Council

Southport Seafront – supplementary planning guidance – November 2003
Objector/
organisation Summary of comment
the rear of their
premises
3. They are concerned
that there is no mention
of the closure of the
highway to the side of
their building – the area
identified as possible
expansion space for
Funland
Change
to
SPG?
Summary of response
by the Council, as is the Pier
Forecourt itself. The future of
the structure would need to be
considered in conjunction with
the Funland development
proposals in consultation with
SLG, other stakeholders and
the public.
2. Removal of rear deck: The
reason for removing this deck
is to complete the improvement
of the lakeside promenade, as
stated in the text. The
‘development footprint’
represented by the deck is
replaced by the potential
development areas for Funland
identified in the SPG. The
principle of such a development
proposal has been discussed
previously with SLG. Planning
consent for expansion of
Funland over the deck has
recently been refused.
Removal of the part of the deck
shown on Fig 9a in the SPG is
a core principle of proposals for
this sire.
3. Closure of highway: all the
development proposals set out
in the SPG will require detailed
procedures to be carried out as
part of implementation. It is not
considered necessary to
identify these in the SPG. SLG
are correct in that the highway
will need to be formally closed
to allow development. It is
understood the closure
procedure will follow once the
Marine Parade Bridge,
currently under construction, is
completed.
44 of 44
D:\Files\01_02_16_UDP_Revw_SPGs_Gen\01_02_16_18_SPGs_PLI_Version\PLI version Southport Seafront SPG.doc