Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - OCHANet

Area Finding Conclusion Recommendation Priority Level By whom By when
Multiple single agency Disaster response better For current and future High National GoP NDMA, March 31
assessments and a lack of meets requirements emergencies in Pakistan,
(Provincial PDMA with HCT
common criteria for where assessment is an NDMA and cluster leads
to follow)
needs assessments have ongoing process and is agree on standard
also meant that responsive to changing assessment formats and
humanitarian partners conditions and feeds into methodology, based on
have been unable to programming.
new IASC guidelines.
jointly prioritize
interventions
Without compatible
information, relief and
Information is gathered in early recovery activities
multiple formats by are more likely to be
Government, Agencies, provided in an
NGOs, cluster, through uncoordinated manner,
individual assessment. based on organizational
Ref to paragraphs 42‐46‐ priorities and assumptions
47.
of what the affected
population needs.
st
As a whole the The humanitarian space The Special Envoy and High National Special Envoy, Continuously
humanitarian response to was compromised during HC/RC promotes needs
HC/RC
the floods prevented a the response to floods based and principled
major food crisis and and displacement crisis. approaches during
disease outbreaks. It also
humanitarian responses
helped raise awareness Considering the sheer and all Humanitarian
and improve access to scale of the emergency, actors need to commit to
health facilities. However, the response was soon it.
a principled approach was stretched to the limit. As a
missing due to strong result coverage was
political interference and limited and generally
limited access (physical
security). Ref. paragraphs
68 to 70
poorly prioritized.
The response was There is a distinct need to To mobilise qualified
constrained by insufficient build human and resources:
Assessments 4
Response 5
Resp
onse
6
8 | P age