29.01.2013 Views

Prawa człowieka w krajach Partnerstwa Wschodniego UE z ...

Prawa człowieka w krajach Partnerstwa Wschodniego UE z ...

Prawa człowieka w krajach Partnerstwa Wschodniego UE z ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. GEORGIA<br />

a. Institutional and legislative framework<br />

A relevant background to analyse the UN stance on the protection of human rights in<br />

Georgia is the 2008 report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights pointing<br />

out the security, humanitarian law and human rights challenges regarding the independence of<br />

the judiciary, the functioning of the penal system and living conditions of internally displaced<br />

persons in the context of the events of November 2007 and the armed conflict in South<br />

Ossetia in August 2008. The Human Rights Committee noted positive legislative and<br />

institutional changes in Georgia, but at the same time expressed its concern that the non-<br />

refoulement principle was not fully respected. CAT, CEDAW and CRD welcomed the<br />

adoption of the Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. CEDAW also welcomed the<br />

adoption of the Law on Combating Human Trafficking and CRC acknowledged the passing of<br />

the Law on Adoption, at the same time recommending implementation of comprehensive<br />

legislation to prevent sexual exploitation of children. The UPR noted that the Georgian Public<br />

Defender (ombudsman) was accredited with “A” status for compliance with the Paris<br />

Principles. CAT and CRC positively evaluated the work of the ombudsman. In terms of<br />

comprehensive institutional and legislative plans, CEDAW expressed its concern about the<br />

lack of a comprehensive approach to gender inequality, while CAT noted the action plans<br />

aimed at improving the situation in prisons and preventing torture and trafficking in human<br />

beings. CRC noted with regret that the 2008-2011 action plan to improve the child welfare did<br />

not cover all the areas of the Convention. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human<br />

Rights positively evaluated cooperation with the Georgian authorities, but at the same time<br />

noted certain difficulties in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.<br />

b. Equality and non-discrimination<br />

Concerning equality and non-discrimination, the Office of the High Commissioner for<br />

Human Rights (UNHCR), CEDAW, CRC and the United Nations Development Fund for<br />

Women (UNIFEM) reported deeply rooted stereotypes concerning religion and the role of<br />

women in the society, and the related patterns of discrimination against women and<br />

widespread domestic violence. CRC raised the issue of birth registration and lack of<br />

comprehensive legislation for children with disabilities.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!