01.02.2013 Views

elektronika electronics - Electronics Journal - Elektrotehnicki fakultet

elektronika electronics - Electronics Journal - Elektrotehnicki fakultet

elektronika electronics - Electronics Journal - Elektrotehnicki fakultet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16<br />

R[ohm]<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Frequency[GHz]<br />

Fig.3 Frequency dependence of parasitic resistances<br />

The intrinsic elements of the small signal equivalent<br />

model have been extracted at several bias conditions. The behavior<br />

of the tranconductance gm at 56 bias points is reported<br />

in Fig. 5 for a 900µm gate width device.<br />

Fig.4 Frequency dependence of parasitic capacitances<br />

The consistency of the extracted elements values has been<br />

evaluated as a function of either the bias conditions and the<br />

device dimensions. Both extrinsic ed intrinsic elements depend<br />

on the gate width. As an example, in Fig 6 the behavior<br />

of the transconductance is reported and clear scaling effects<br />

can be seen.<br />

gm [S]<br />

C[pf]<br />

0.12<br />

0.08<br />

0.04<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

VDS [V]<br />

Frequency[GHz]<br />

ELECTRONICS, VOL. 8, NO.1, MAY 2004.<br />

VGS [V]<br />

CPG<br />

CPD<br />

Rg<br />

Rs<br />

Rd<br />

Fig.5 Bias conditions dependence of the transconductance g m<br />

gm[S]<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6<br />

VDS<br />

W=300<br />

W=600<br />

W=900<br />

VGS=0V<br />

Fig.6 Behavior of g m vs. V ds for devices of scaled gate widths<br />

We report in Figs. 7-10 the comparison between the<br />

measured and simulated [S] parameters sets, as outputs of the<br />

AWR software, for a 900 µm device. This test thus gives a<br />

demonstration of the fitting performance of the extracted<br />

model.<br />

0<br />

0 .2<br />

-0.2<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

-0.4<br />

0.6<br />

-0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

-0.8<br />

0.8<br />

S11<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

-1 .0<br />

2.0<br />

3.0<br />

-2.0<br />

2.0<br />

4.0<br />

5.0<br />

-3.0<br />

Swp Max<br />

6GHz<br />

3.0<br />

10 .0<br />

4.0<br />

-4 .0<br />

5.0<br />

10 .0<br />

-10.0<br />

-5.0<br />

Swp Min<br />

0.3475GHz<br />

Fig. 7 S 11 parameter measured and modeled<br />

Ma g Ma x<br />

25<br />

16 5<br />

-180<br />

150<br />

-16 5<br />

5<br />

Per Div<br />

-15 0<br />

13 5<br />

-135<br />

120<br />

-120<br />

105<br />

-105<br />

S21<br />

90<br />

-90<br />

75<br />

-75<br />

60<br />

-60<br />

45<br />

-45<br />

Swp Ma x<br />

6 GHz<br />

30<br />

-30<br />

1 5<br />

-1 5<br />

0<br />

Swp Min<br />

0.3475 GHz<br />

Fig. 8 S 21 parameter measured and modeled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!