An Overview of the Foundation Programme in - London Deanery
An Overview of the Foundation Programme in - London Deanery
An Overview of the Foundation Programme in - London Deanery
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
� It is suggested that both F1 and F2 TAB is taken <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last month <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />
placement dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year. If <strong>the</strong>re are significant concerns about any foundation<br />
doctor, TAB should be repeated. Deaneries have <strong>the</strong> option <strong>of</strong> alter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong> TAB to satisfy local needs<br />
� For eac h as sessment, t he foundation d octor a nd t he e ducational s upervisor<br />
should agree 1 5 r aters/assessors. A m <strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> 10 r eturns are r equired. N o<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r foundation doctor can be a rater.<br />
The required mix <strong>of</strong> raters/assessors must <strong>in</strong>clude at least two <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
� Doctors more senior than F2, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g at least one consultant or GP pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />
� Senior nurses (band 5 or above)<br />
� Al lied health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
� O<strong>the</strong>r team members <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ward clerks, secretaries and auxiliary staff.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g T AB, t he foundation doctor s hould r eflect o n a ny s ections i n w hich <strong>the</strong>re i s<br />
variance be tween t heir s elf r at<strong>in</strong>g a nd t hat <strong>of</strong> t he as sessors. T he doctor s hould di scuss<br />
significant discrepancies with <strong>the</strong>ir educational supervisor.<br />
End <strong>of</strong> placement reports<br />
There are two end <strong>of</strong> placement reports:<br />
a) cl<strong>in</strong>ical supervisor’s end <strong>of</strong> placement report<br />
b) educational supervisor’s end <strong>of</strong> placement report<br />
The c l<strong>in</strong>ical s upervisor’s en d o f pl acement r eport d escribes th e foundation doctor’s<br />
performance i n t he w orkplace. T he e ducational s upervisor’s r eport i ncorporates <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical supervisor’s report and <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>the</strong> eportfolio.<br />
If th e e ducational and c l<strong>in</strong>ical s upervisors ar e one an d t he s ame, t hen t he educational<br />
supervisor will b e r esponsible for t he s ections t hat a re u sually c overed i n t he cl<strong>in</strong> ical<br />
supervisor’s report.<br />
a) Cl<strong>in</strong>ical supervisor’s end <strong>of</strong> placement report<br />
Towards <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> each placement, <strong>the</strong> foundation doctor should meet with <strong>the</strong>ir cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
supervisor to complete a summative assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir overall performance and progress<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> placement.<br />
The cl<strong>in</strong>ical supervisor’s report should comment specifically on:<br />
� <strong>An</strong>y noteworthy aspect <strong>of</strong> performance<br />
� <strong>An</strong>y concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g performance<br />
� Comments on participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreed educational process<br />
� Evidence <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development as a result <strong>of</strong> feedback and reflection.<br />
The c l<strong>in</strong>ical s upervisor s hould seek a nd r ecord evidence from <strong>the</strong> Placement Supervision<br />
Group to c orroborate each o f t he a bove. T he names <strong>of</strong> th ose c ontribut<strong>in</strong>g e vidence on<br />
performance is recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
The outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al assessment discussion should be agreed by both <strong>the</strong> foundation<br />
doctor a nd t he c l<strong>in</strong>ical s upervisor an d r ecorded i n th e e- portfolio as part <strong>of</strong> t he c l<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
supervisor’s end <strong>of</strong> placement report.<br />
b) Educational supervisor’s end <strong>of</strong> placement report<br />
The educational s upervisor’s e nd <strong>of</strong> placement r eport r equires r eview o f t he c l<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
supervisor’s report along with evidence provided with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> e-portfolio and any o<strong>the</strong>r source.<br />
7