09.02.2013 Views

Nitrile Oxides, Nitrones, and Nitronates in Organic Synthesis : Novel ...

Nitrile Oxides, Nitrones, and Nitronates in Organic Synthesis : Novel ...

Nitrile Oxides, Nitrones, and Nitronates in Organic Synthesis : Novel ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

662 NITRONATES<br />

Table 3.27 Some calculations for model BENA <strong>and</strong> related compounds<br />

Entry Compound R X Conform. rel.E a kJ/mol<br />

1 (422) H H A ′b 0<br />

2 (422) H H B 30.3<br />

3 (422) H H TSR 2 37.0<br />

4 (422) H H TSN 4.5 b<br />

5 (423) OSiMe3 H A + 0.3<br />

6 (423) OSiMe3 H B 0<br />

7 (423) OSiMe3 H TSR1 8.8<br />

8 (423) OSiMe3 H TSR2 23.9<br />

9 (423) OSiMe3 H TSN 65.3<br />

10 (424) Me 4-NO2-C6H4- B 45.0 c<br />

11 (425) Me EtO2C B 51.0 d<br />

a The values were calculated tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to consideration the zero-po<strong>in</strong>t vibration energy.<br />

b Experimental 4.2 kJ/mol (506a).<br />

c By NMR data (see Table 3.25).<br />

d Ref. (505)b.<br />

For st<strong>and</strong>ard v<strong>in</strong>ylam<strong>in</strong>e (422), the change between stable conformations<br />

A⇄A ′ through the transition state B, caused by rotation about the C,N bond<br />

requires more than 30 kJ/mol, whereas both the calculated <strong>and</strong> experimental<br />

nitrogen <strong>in</strong>version barriers are not higher than 5 kJ/mol. (The data for compounds<br />

(424) <strong>and</strong> (425) (entries 10 <strong>and</strong> 11) demonstrated that the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />

electron-withdraw<strong>in</strong>g groups at the β-C atom of enam<strong>in</strong>es leads to a substantial<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the barrier to rotation about the C,N bond <strong>in</strong> enam<strong>in</strong>es.) The nitrogen<br />

atom <strong>in</strong> v<strong>in</strong>ylam<strong>in</strong>e (422) is substantially ßattened (the calculated sum of bond<br />

angles is 341.4 ◦ ).<br />

However, a quite different situation is observed for ene nitroso acetal (423).<br />

First, a stable conformation <strong>and</strong>, correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, new transition states TSR1 <strong>and</strong><br />

TSR1* with a low barrier (8.8 kJ/mol) appear on the rotation coord<strong>in</strong>ate about<br />

the C,N bond at the place of the transition state of enam<strong>in</strong>e (422). Therefore, the<br />

barrier to rotation about the C,N bond decreases so that the process is fast on the<br />

NMR time scale <strong>and</strong> cannot be detected by this method.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, for compound (423) both the nitrogen <strong>in</strong>version barrier<br />

(65.3 kJ/mol) <strong>and</strong> pyramidalization at the nitrogen atom are substantially higher<br />

(the sum of the bond angles at the nitrogen atom is 309.7 ◦ <strong>and</strong> 321.0 ◦ for the<br />

conformations B <strong>and</strong> A, respectively). A noticeable decrease <strong>in</strong> the degree of<br />

pyramidalization at nitrogen <strong>in</strong> the conformation A is <strong>in</strong>dicative of a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

degree of nπ conjugation.) The nitrogen <strong>in</strong>version barrier is suitable for observation<br />

on the NMR time scale (see below).<br />

Special calculations for hypothetical nitroso acetal (426) demonstrated that the<br />

energy m<strong>in</strong>imum for the conformation B is due to the partial compensation of<br />

the absence of stabilization through nπ conjugation by favorable steric factors<br />

(Fig. 3.5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!