12.02.2013 Views

the genus rebutia 1895—1981 - Free

the genus rebutia 1895—1981 - Free

the genus rebutia 1895—1981 - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

spiralisepala Jajo ex Brederoo nomen nudum<br />

steinmannii (Solms-Laub.) Krainz = R. steinmannii<br />

steinmannii var. complanata Rausch nomen nudum<br />

steinmannii var. rotundiseta Rausch nomen nudum<br />

steinmannii var. rubriflora Rausch nomen nudum<br />

stellata Frič nomen nudum = ?<br />

struwelpeter Frič nomen nudum = ?<br />

sulcomammillata Frič nomen nudum = ?<br />

tarvitaensis Ritter comb. nud. = R. tarvitaensis<br />

tarvitensis = R. tarvitaensis<br />

turbiniformis Frič nomen nudum = ?<br />

uniclaricentra Frič nomen nudum = ?<br />

uninigricentra Frič nomen nudum = ?<br />

wal<strong>the</strong>riana Borg = R. spegazziniana<br />

Check list of Rebutia species<br />

The following is a list of specific and varietal names which have been used in<br />

connection with <strong>the</strong> <strong>genus</strong> Rebutia. A large number of <strong>the</strong>se names are invalid,<br />

unfortunately many of <strong>the</strong>m are still in use and have <strong>the</strong>refore been included. Please<br />

realise that this is not a complete check list as we are sure <strong>the</strong>re are many o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

names and combinations which have appeared in obscure publications and which<br />

are not included. Nursery catalogues are a fruitful source of misnames and invalid<br />

combinations. As it is, <strong>the</strong> list already contains nearly 800 names and combinations.<br />

We do not pretend to know what are all <strong>the</strong> correct current names for many of<br />

<strong>the</strong> names in <strong>the</strong> following list for a variety of reasons.<br />

a) often living plants of many of <strong>the</strong> named ‘species’ are not in cultivation and in<br />

addition were sometimes inadequately described without photographs. This<br />

means that accurate assessment as to status or indeed relationship to a<br />

currently accepted name is extremely difficult and often impossible.<br />

b) names have sometimes been given to plants which after fur<strong>the</strong>r field work<br />

appear to have been described from extreme geographical forms. They have<br />

never been recollected and probably never will be again (e.g. R. albipilosa)<br />

c) many of <strong>the</strong> names are names in <strong>the</strong> literature described without full<br />

description and so referal to <strong>the</strong> correct name is often impossible.<br />

d) a number of <strong>the</strong> names have not been published in accordance with <strong>the</strong> code of<br />

Botanical Nomenclature and have <strong>the</strong>refore to be excluded.<br />

The complex and superfluous nature of <strong>the</strong> names in this <strong>genus</strong> is admirably<br />

illustrated by <strong>the</strong> example of Rebutia senilis, where <strong>the</strong>re are no less than 50 possible<br />

combinations.<br />

I Starred * names have accurate locational data and have been used in <strong>the</strong><br />

compilation of <strong>the</strong> distribution maps.<br />

II The accepted species toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> names of plants which are reasonably<br />

distinct and identifiable are set in bold type.<br />

III All o<strong>the</strong>r names are set in italic type.<br />

59<br />

unigricentra -><br />

uninigricentra

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!