onderzoek camera.pdf - Algemene Directie Veiligheid en Preventie

Gids camerabewaking - Ook wie weg is, is gezien?Overgenomen bronnen uit het wetenschappelijk onderzoek:ARMITAGE, R. (2002). To CCTV or not to CCTV. a review of current research into the effectiveness of CCTVsystems in reducing crime. Crime and Social Policy Section, 1-8.BREW, N. (2005). An overview of the effectiveness of closed circuit television (CCTV) surveillance. (Rep. No.14). The Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Services.: (http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/2005-06/06rn14.pdf).DE MEIJER, B. (2000). Cameratoezicht in het publieke domein in EU-landen. (Rep. No. 5).DITTON, J. & SHORT, E. (1999). Yes, it works, no it doesn't: comparing the effects of open-street CCTV in twoadjacent scottish town centres. Crime Prevention Studies, 10, 201-223.FLIGHT, S. (2010). Less is more: vier trends in cameratoezicht. Beveiliging totaal, 69-78.FLIGHT, S & Rovers, B. (2012). De verspilde moeite van evidence based cameratoezicht. DSP Group, 12 p.GILL, M. & TURBIN, V. (1999). Evaluating "realistic evaluation": evidence from a study of CCTV. CrimePrevention Studies, 10, 179-199.PHILLIPS, C. (2003). A review of CCTV evaluations: Crime reduction effects and attitudes towards its use.Crime Prevention Studies, 10, 132-155.VAN DEN HERREWEGEN, E. (2011) Social analysis of security : financial, economic and ecological crime ; crime,(in)security and (dis)trust ; public and private policing. In: Het groene gras, Gent, Universiteit Gent, 233-255.WELSH, B. & FARRINGTON, D. P. (2007). Closed-circuit television surveillance. In Preventing Crime: WhatWorks for Children, Offenders, Victims and Places. (pp. 193-208). Springer.40