14.09.2013 Views

HELSE 9 00 VEST - Helse Fonna

HELSE 9 00 VEST - Helse Fonna

HELSE 9 00 VEST - Helse Fonna

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. Summary<br />

The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services conducted the second national<br />

survey among general practitioners’ (GP) assessment of community mental<br />

health centres in the autumn of 2<strong>00</strong>8. The previous survey was conducted in 2<strong>00</strong>6.<br />

In 2<strong>00</strong>8 eighty centres participated in the survey and a total of 2,209 GPs answered<br />

the questionnaire.<br />

The survey shows that GPs are most satisfied with the quality of the discharge letters,<br />

competence at the centres, and the centres sensitivity to the GPs’ assessments.<br />

The national results show that 54% in large or very large degree perceived the quality<br />

of the discharge letters from the local centre to be of good quality, 50% in large or<br />

very large degree meant the centre has good professional competence, and 52% perceived<br />

that the local centre was sensitive to the GPs’ assessments.<br />

The survey also showed that the centres have several areas with improvement potential.<br />

According to GPs this especially relates to cooperative meetings and guidance,<br />

number of doctors at the centres and feedback from the centres to the GP during<br />

treatment processes. The national results show that 68% of the GPs meant that the<br />

centre in little degree or not at all offer organized guidance and professional seminars<br />

of good quality, while 59 % in little degree or not at all has cooperative meetings<br />

with the centre. 56% of the GPs responded that they in little degree or not at all received<br />

necessary feedback from the centre during treatment processes, while 50 %<br />

responded that the centre in little degree or not at all has good doctor coverage.<br />

The results for the health enterprises and the centres in 2<strong>00</strong>8 are compared on six<br />

scales: emergency situations, guidance, competence, workforce situation, discharge<br />

letter and waiting time. There are substantial differences in scores on these scales<br />

between the health enterprises and between the centres, especially for workforce<br />

situation and guidance.<br />

A comparison of survey results from 2<strong>00</strong>8 and 2<strong>00</strong>6 show small changes. However,<br />

the national result for the guidance scale was significantly higher in 2<strong>00</strong>8; three<br />

points higher on a scale from 0 to 1<strong>00</strong> where 1<strong>00</strong> is best. In addition, the GPs general<br />

satisfaction with the centres has a two point significant improvement. There are<br />

few significant changes in scale scores for regions and health enterprises, but a lot of<br />

changes at the centre level for guidance and workforce situation.<br />

4 1. Summary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!